Monique J Roobol

Author PubWeight™ 216.86‹?›

Top papers

Rank Title Journal Year PubWeight™‹?›
1 Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009 35.94
2 Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 2012 16.91
3 Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med 2012 7.21
4 Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ 2014 4.75
5 Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 2012 4.48
6 Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur Urol 2012 4.07
7 A critical analysis of the tumor volume threshold for clinically insignificant prostate cancer using a data set of a randomized screening trial. J Urol 2010 3.79
8 Infectious complications and hospital admissions after prostate biopsy in a European randomized trial. Eur Urol 2012 3.34
9 Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study. Eur Urol 2012 3.07
10 Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. Eur Urol 2008 2.92
11 Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002 2.87
12 The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. Clin Cancer Res 2010 2.87
13 Balancing the harms and benefits of early detection of prostate cancer. Cancer 2010 2.71
14 Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in clinical decision-making during active surveillance for early prostate cancer--a review. Eur Urol 2008 2.66
15 Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol 2010 2.47
16 Prostate-specific antigen velocity for early detection of prostate cancer: result from a large, representative, population-based cohort. Eur Urol 2009 2.31
17 Does PSA velocity predict prostate cancer in pre-screened populations? Eur Urol 2006 2.24
18 The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC. Int J Cancer 2010 2.15
19 Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 2012 2.05
20 Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. Eur Urol 2007 2.02
21 Outcomes of a bladder cancer screening program using home hematuria testing and molecular markers. Eur Urol 2013 2.01
22 Is prostate-specific antigen velocity selective for clinically significant prostate cancer in screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam). Eur Urol 2008 1.94
23 No excess mortality after prostate biopsy: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int 2010 1.94
24 The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2008 1.92
25 Prostate cancer incidence and disease-specific survival of men with initial prostate-specific antigen less than 3.0 ng/ml who are participating in ERSPC Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2011 1.83
26 Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 1.83
27 Active surveillance for prostate cancers detected in three subsequent rounds of a screening trial: characteristics, PSA doubling times, and outcome. Eur Urol 2006 1.80
28 Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2013 1.73
29 Risk-based prostate cancer screening. Eur Urol 2011 1.64
30 Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2012 1.62
31 Do anxiety and distress increase during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer? J Urol 2010 1.61
32 Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 2007 1.57
33 Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol 2008 1.56
34 Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre 'Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance' study. BJU Int 2009 1.56
35 ERSPC and PLCO prostate cancer screening studies: what are the differences? Eur Urol 2010 1.55
36 Management and survival of screen-detected prostate cancer patients who might have been suitable for active surveillance. Eur Urol 2006 1.54
37 Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC Rotterdam. Urology 2006 1.51
38 Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer. Cancer 2009 1.49
39 Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. World J Urol 2011 1.42
40 Prostate cancer mortality in screen and clinically detected prostate cancer: estimating the screening benefit. Eur J Cancer 2009 1.41
41 The REDUCE Trial. Eur Urol 2010 1.39
42 Can one blood draw replace transrectal ultrasonography-estimated prostate volume to predict prostate cancer risk? BJU Int 2013 1.39
43 ERG immunohistochemistry is not predictive for PSA recurrence, local recurrence or overall survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Mod Pathol 2011 1.31
44 The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators indicating a positive prostate biopsy: a comparison. BJU Int 2008 1.28
45 Towards an optimal interval for prostate cancer screening. Eur Urol 2011 1.27
46 A four-kallikrein panel predicts prostate cancer in men with recent screening: data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam. Clin Cancer Res 2010 1.24
47 Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening. Eur Urol 2007 1.18
48 Predictors of unfavourable repeat biopsy results in men participating in a prospective active surveillance program. Eur Urol 2011 1.16
49 Is delayed radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk screen-detected prostate cancer associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes? Cancer 2010 1.13
50 Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Invest Radiol 2014 1.12
51 Empirical estimates of prostate cancer overdiagnosis by age and prostate-specific antigen. BMC Med 2014 1.11
52 Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section rotterdam. J Urol 2005 1.08
53 Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC. Eur Urol 2008 1.08
54 4-year prostate specific antigen progression and diagnosis of prostate cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. J Urol 2005 1.07
55 Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in men with prostate cancer and rising PSA: effectiveness of a dietary supplement. Eur Urol 2005 1.06
56 Eleven-year outcome of patients with prostate cancers diagnosed during screening after initial negative sextant biopsies. Eur Urol 2009 1.05
57 Defining the optimal prostate-specific antigen threshold for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2009 1.04
58 Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer: impact on screen-detected populations. Cancer 2007 1.04
59 Prostate-specific antigen change in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. Urology 2004 1.02
60 Prevalence and characteristics of screen-detected prostate carcinomas at low prostate-specific antigen levels: aggressive or insignificant? BJU Int 2005 1.01
61 Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2013 1.00
62 Should pathologists routinely report prostate tumour volume? The prognostic value of tumour volume in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2009 0.99
63 Comparison of risk calculators from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer in a contemporary Canadian cohort. BJU Int 2011 0.98
64 Screening for prostate cancer without digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound: results after four years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Prostate 2006 0.95
65 Gleason score 7 screen-detected prostate cancers initially managed expectantly: outcomes in 50 men. BJU Int 2009 0.94
66 Prevalence, treatment modalities and prognosis of familial prostate cancer in a screened population. J Urol 2006 0.94
67 Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. World J Urol 2012 0.94
68 Defining increased future risk for prostate cancer: evidence from a population based screening cohort. J Urol 2008 0.93
69 Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study. BJU Int 2011 0.93
70 Impacts of a population-based prostate cancer screening programme on excess total mortality rates in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen 2013 0.92
71 Screening for prostate cancer: early detection or overdetection? Annu Rev Med 2011 0.92
72 The value of an additional hypoechoic lesion-directed biopsy core for detecting prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008 0.90
73 A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels. Psychooncology 2014 0.89
74 Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality. J Med Screen 2012 0.89
75 Validation of stem cell markers in clinical prostate cancer: α6-integrin is predictive for non-aggressive disease. Prostate 2013 0.89
76 Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012 0.89
77 Detection rates of high-grade prostate cancer during subsequent screening visits. Results of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer. Int J Cancer 2006 0.89
78 Effect of the correction for noncompliance and contamination on the estimated reduction of metastatic prostate cancer within a randomized screening trial (ERSPC section Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 2010 0.89
79 Prostate specific antigen velocity does not aid prostate cancer detection in men with prior negative biopsy. J Urol 2010 0.87
80 Prediction of prostate cancer in unscreened men: external validation of a risk calculator. Eur J Cancer 2010 0.87
81 Tumour features in the control and screening arm of a randomized trial of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2005 0.87
82 Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam. BJU Int 2012 0.86
83 Excess all-cause mortality in the evaluation of a screening trial to account for selective participation. J Med Screen 2013 0.86
84 Can non-malignant biopsy features identify men at increased risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer at re-screening after 4 years? BJU Int 2007 0.86
85 Prostate cancer detection in the prostate specific antigen range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml: value of percent free prostate specific antigen on tumor detection and tumor aggressiveness. J Urol 2004 0.86
86 Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics. Prostate 2007 0.86
87 Prostate cancer epidemic in sight? Eur Urol 2012 0.86
88 Rotterdam randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer--an overview after 10 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 0.85
89 Compliance with biopsy recommendations of a prostate cancer risk calculator. BJU Int 2011 0.84
90 Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator. Eur J Cancer 2010 0.84
91 Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*. BJU Int 2012 0.84
92 Disease insight and treatment perception of men on active surveillance for early prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009 0.83
93 Prostate cancer in the Swedish section of ERSPC--evidence for less metastases at diagnosis but not for mortality reduction. Eur Urol 2006 0.82
94 Disease-specific mortality may underestimate the total effect of prostate cancer screening. J Med Screen 2010 0.82
95 Expert Involvement Predicts mHealth App Downloads: Multivariate Regression Analysis of Urology Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 0.81
96 Defining and predicting indolent and low risk prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011 0.81
97 Active surveillance: oncologic outcome. Curr Opin Urol 2013 0.81
98 Predictive models in diagnosing indolent cancer. Cancer 2009 0.81
99 Critical assessment of prebiopsy parameters for predicting prostate cancer metastasis and mortality. Can J Urol 2011 0.80
100 Biochemical progression rates in the screen arm compared to the control arm of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Prostate 2006 0.80
101 Comparison of incidentally detected prostate cancer with screen-detected prostate cancer treated by prostatectomy. Prostate 2011 0.80
102 Profiling of antibody production against xenograft-released proteins by protein microarrays discovers prostate cancer markers. J Proteome Res 2011 0.80
103 Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 and β-microseminoprotein on prostate cancer needle biopsies do not have predictive value for subsequent prostatectomy outcome. BJU Int 2011 0.79
104 Should prostate-specific antigen screening be offered to asymptomatic men? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010 0.79
105 Reply from authors re: Michael Baum. Screening for prostate cancer: can we learn from the mistakes of the breast screening experience? Eur Urol 2013;64:540-1: screening for prostate cancer: we have learned and are still learning. Eur Urol 2013 0.79
106 Sexual function with localized prostate cancer: active surveillance vs radical therapy. BJU Int 2012 0.79
107 Identifying and characterizing "escapes"-men who develop metastases or die from prostate cancer despite screening (ERSPC, section Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 2011 0.78
108 PSA-based prostate cancer screening: the role of active surveillance and informed and shared decision making. Asian J Androl 2011 0.78
109 On the use of prostate-specific antigen for screening of prostate cancer in European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010 0.78
110 Updating the prostate cancer risk indicator for contemporary biopsy schemes. Can J Urol 2011 0.78
111 Epilogue: different approaches for prostate cancer screening in the EU? Eur J Cancer 2010 0.77
112 What's new in screening in 2015? Curr Opin Urol 2016 0.77
113 Disease-specific survival of men with prostate cancer detected during the screening interval: results of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer-Rotterdam after 11 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 2011 0.77
114 Selection of microsatellite markers for bladder cancer diagnosis without the need for corresponding blood. PLoS One 2012 0.77
115 Dutasteride and prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2010 0.77
116 Feasibility study of adjustment for contamination and non-compliance in a prostate cancer screening trial. Prostate 2007 0.76
117 Re: Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial. BJU Int 2008 0.75
118 Words of wisdom. Re: PSA density improves prediction of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014 0.75
119 Re: Is a screening interval of every 4 years for prostate cancer acceptable? J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 0.75
120 Selective detection of aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer 2011 0.75
121 Prostate cancer biomarkers to improve risk stratification: is our knowledge of prostate cancer sufficient to spare prostate biopsies safely? Eur Urol 2011 0.75
122 How common is PSA screening in elderly men with limited life expectancies? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2007 0.75
123 Is prostate cancer screening bad or good? Summary of a debate at the innovation in urology meeting, September 17-19, 2010, Milan, Italy. Eur Urol 2010 0.75
124 Words of wisdom. Re: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA velocity for prostate cancer detection in men aged <50 years. Eur Urol 2007 0.75
125 Propensity score matching, competing risk analysis, and a competing risk nomogram: some guidance for urologists may be in place. Eur Urol 2011 0.75
126 [Early detection of prostate cancer--recommendations after 13 years of follow-up in the European randomised study]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015 0.75
127 Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017. Curr Opin Urol 2017 0.75
128 Increased non-prostate cancer death risk in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer. BJU Int 2012 0.75
129 Overestimation of prostate cancer mortality and other-cause mortality by the Kaplan-Meier method. Can J Urol 2013 0.75
130 Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years. Cancer 2005 0.75
131 Screening for prostate cancer: have we resolved the controversy? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2010 0.75
132 Prospective validation of a risk calculator which calculates the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in a contemporary clinical cohort. Eur J Cancer 2012 0.75
133 [Guidelines on the early detection of prostate cancer]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015 0.75
134 Detection characteristics in randomized prostate screening. Clin Cancer Res 2004 0.75