Published in Curr Biol on March 25, 2010
Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci (2011) 3.04
The generalization of prior uncertainty during reaching. J Neurosci (2014) 1.45
Motor learning of novel dynamics is not represented in a single global coordinate system: evaluation of mixed coordinate representations and local learning. J Neurophysiol (2013) 1.03
Context-dependent decay of motor memories during skill acquisition. Curr Biol (2013) 1.00
The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories. J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.98
Fast but fleeting: adaptive motor learning processes associated with aging and cognitive decline. J Neurosci (2014) 0.96
A single-rate context-dependent learning process underlies rapid adaptation to familiar object dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 0.91
The effects of training breadth on motor generalization. J Neurophysiol (2014) 0.81
Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth. Exp Brain Res (2012) 0.80
Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned. PLoS One (2015) 0.79
Generalization of unconstrained reaching with hand-weight changes. J Neurophysiol (2012) 0.79
Coordinate Representations for Interference Reduction in Motor Learning. PLoS One (2015) 0.78
Visual Cues of Object Properties Differentially Affect Anticipatory Planning of Digit Forces and Placement. PLoS One (2016) 0.78
Unexperienced mechanical effects of muscular fatigue can be predicted by the Central Nervous System as revealed by anticipatory postural adjustments. Exp Brain Res (2014) 0.77
Grip type and task goal modify reach-to-grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis. Motor Control (2012) 0.76
Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools. Exp Brain Res (2017) 0.75
Individualistic weight perception from motion on a slope. Sci Rep (2016) 0.75
Adaptation of lift forces in object manipulation through action observation. Exp Brain Res (2013) 0.75
On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil (2017) 0.75
Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci (1994) 11.84
Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature (2000) 6.37
Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw (1998) 5.33
Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res (1984) 4.89
Motor prediction. Curr Biol (2001) 3.81
Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1996) 3.19
The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci (1997) 2.66
Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (1978) 2.57
Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci (2004) 2.47
Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr Biol (2008) 2.40
Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput (2001) 2.34
Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci (2008) 2.28
Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? J Neurophysiol (2008) 2.09
A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods (2009) 2.02
Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat Neurosci (2000) 1.94
Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci (2002) 1.88
Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory. J Neurosci (2009) 1.85
Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. J Neurophysiol (1993) 1.77
After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? Trends Cogn Sci (2003) 1.66
Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J Neurosci (2002) 1.60
Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res (1991) 1.53
Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn Psychol (1989) 1.51
Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces. J Neurosci (1997) 1.44
Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? Exp Brain Res (2006) 1.39
Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. J Neurophysiol (2006) 1.31
Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. Can J Exp Psychol (2001) 1.30
Learning to recognize objects. Trends Cogn Sci (1999) 1.30
Visual cues signaling object grasp reduce interference in motor learning. J Neurophysiol (2009) 1.28
Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2005) 1.25
Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1998) 1.15
Selective use of visual information signaling objects' center of mass for anticipatory control of manipulative fingertip forces. Exp Brain Res (2003) 1.13
Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2005) 1.12
Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues. Exp Brain Res (1991) 1.12
The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res (2000) 1.05
Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference. Percept Psychophys (1993) 0.98
Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition (1998) 0.88
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature (2004) 8.02
Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci (2008) 7.66
Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci (2009) 5.03
Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci (2011) 3.04
Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci (2006) 3.00
Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol (2002) 2.97
When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol (2002) 2.84
Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature (2009) 2.70
The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol (2003) 2.59
Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci (2004) 2.47
Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci (2001) 2.20
The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2004) 2.17
Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science (2003) 2.16
Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biol (2006) 2.08
A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods (2009) 2.02
Evidence for sensory prediction deficits in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry (2005) 2.00
Motor task variation induces structural learning. Curr Biol (2009) 1.98
Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron (2011) 1.91
Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci (2002) 1.88
The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp Brain Res (2004) 1.72
Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol (2003) 1.68
Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol (2006) 1.67
Learning optimal adaptation strategies in unpredictable motor tasks. J Neurosci (2009) 1.66
Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2002) 1.66
Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res (2005) 1.63
Rhythmicity, randomness and synchrony in climbing fiber signals. Trends Neurosci (2005) 1.58
Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2002) 1.54
The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res (2008) 1.52
Structure learning in action. Behav Brain Res (2009) 1.51
Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability. J Neurosci (2008) 1.47
The main sequence of saccades optimizes speed-accuracy trade-off. Biol Cybern (2006) 1.45
Deliberation in the motor system: reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision. J Neurosci (2012) 1.43
Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Curr Biol (2005) 1.40
Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. J Neurophysiol (2008) 1.37
Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nat Neurosci (2005) 1.36
Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. J Neurosci (2005) 1.36
Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron (2005) 1.32
Impedance control reduces instability that arises from motor noise. J Neurosci (2009) 1.31
Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol (2002) 1.30
Consolidation of dynamic motor learning is not disrupted by rTMS of primary motor cortex. Curr Biol (2004) 1.30
A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control. PLoS Biol (2004) 1.29
Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 1.29
Bayesian integration in force estimation. J Neurophysiol (2004) 1.28
Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. J Neurophysiol (2002) 1.25
Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning. Neurosci Lett (2004) 1.24
Risk-sensitive optimal feedback control accounts for sensorimotor behavior under uncertainty. PLoS Comput Biol (2010) 1.23
Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. J Neural Eng (2005) 1.22
Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control. Front Hum Neurosci (2011) 1.20
Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements. J Neurophysiol (2010) 1.17
Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2003) 1.16
Statistics of natural movements are reflected in motor errors. J Neurophysiol (2009) 1.11
Nash equilibria in multi-agent motor interactions. PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 1.11
Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. J Neurophysiol (2006) 1.09
Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res (2010) 1.09
Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states. J Neurosci (2012) 1.08
Neural correlates of internal-model loading. Curr Biol (2006) 1.08
Motor learning. Curr Biol (2010) 1.07
Separate representations of dynamics in rhythmic and discrete movements: evidence from motor learning. J Neurophysiol (2011) 1.07
Internal representations of temporal statistics and feedback calibrate motor-sensory interval timing. PLoS Comput Biol (2012) 1.06
Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. J Neurophysiol (2012) 1.05
Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory. Exp Brain Res (2005) 1.05
Optimal control of redundant muscles in step-tracking wrist movements. J Neurophysiol (2005) 1.05
Motor learning of novel dynamics is not represented in a single global coordinate system: evaluation of mixed coordinate representations and local learning. J Neurophysiol (2013) 1.03
Flexible representations of dynamics are used in object manipulation. Curr Biol (2008) 1.02
Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals. PLoS One (2008) 1.02
Simultaneous bimanual dynamics are learned without interference. Exp Brain Res (2007) 1.01
Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning. J Neurosci (2008) 1.01
Risk-sensitivity and the mean-variance trade-off: decision making in sensorimotor control. Proc Biol Sci (2011) 1.01
Material evidence: interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. J Neurophysiol (2012) 1.00
Context-dependent decay of motor memories during skill acquisition. Curr Biol (2013) 1.00
Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. J Neurophysiol (2003) 0.99
Inferring visuomotor priors for sensorimotor learning. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 0.98
The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories. J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.98
The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands. J Neurosci (2013) 0.98
Facilitation of learning induced by both random and gradual visuomotor task variation. J Neurophysiol (2011) 0.97
Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems. J Neurosci (2006) 0.97
Planning movements in a simple redundant task. Curr Biol (2002) 0.97
Representations of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2011) 0.97
Where one hand meets the other: limb-specific and action-dependent movement plans decoded from preparatory signals in single human frontoparietal brain areas. J Neurosci (2013) 0.97
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. PLoS One (2010) 0.96
Sensorimotor memory of weight asymmetry in object manipulation. Exp Brain Res (2007) 0.94
Risk sensitivity in a motor task with speed-accuracy trade-off. J Neurophysiol (2011) 0.92
Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined. Exp Brain Res (2004) 0.92
Deficits in sensory prediction are related to delusional ideation in healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia (2010) 0.91
A single-rate context-dependent learning process underlies rapid adaptation to familiar object dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 0.91
An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex. Neuropsychologia (2007) 0.91
Spatial representation of predictive motor learning. J Neurophysiol (2003) 0.90
Simultaneous encoding of the direction and orientation of potential targets during reach planning: evidence of multiple competing reach plans. J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.90