Empirical estimates of the lead time distribution for prostate cancer based on two independent representative cohorts of men not subject to prostate-specific antigen screening.

PubWeight™: 1.18‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2866147)

Published in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev on April 20, 2010

Authors

Caroline J Savage1, Hans Lilja, Angel M Cronin, David Ulmert, Andrew J Vickers

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 307 East 63rd Street, New York, NY 10065, USA. savagec@mskcc.org

Articles cited by this

Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin (2009) 83.57

Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med (2009) 35.94

Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med (2009) 30.05

Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 11.27

Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 9.45

A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer. JAMA (1995) 8.60

Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 6.96

Screening for prostate cancer--the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med (2009) 3.59

Long-term prediction of prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity is predictive but does not improve the predictive accuracy of a single PSA measurement 15 years or more before cancer diagnosis in a large, representative, unscreened population. J Clin Oncol (2008) 3.50

Latent carcinoma of prostate at autopsy in seven areas. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyons, France. Int J Cancer (1977) 2.56

Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst (1999) 2.35

Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends. Biometrics (2007) 2.09

Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer. Int J Cancer (2004) 1.93

Screening for prostate cancer: estimating the magnitude of overdetection. CMAJ (1998) 1.77

Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening. Nat Rev Urol (2009) 1.76

Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening. Br J Cancer (2009) 1.36

Natural history of changes in prostate specific antigen in early stage prostate cancer. J Urol (1994) 1.16

Overdiagnosis in early detection programs. Biostatistics (2004) 1.12

Eleven-year outcome of patients with prostate cancers diagnosed during screening after initial negative sextant biopsies. Eur Urol (2009) 1.05

The predictive value of prostate cancer biomarkers depends on age and time to diagnosis: towards a biologically-based screening strategy. Int J Cancer (2007) 1.04

MISCAN: estimating lead-time and over-detection by simulation. BJU Int (2003) 0.97

Prostate-specific antigen testing of older men. J Natl Cancer Inst (1999) 0.85

Computational methods in medical decision making: to screen or not to screen? Stat Med (2005) 0.83

Articles by these authors

Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med (2009) 35.94

Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med (2012) 16.91

Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology (2010) 14.07

Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol (2010) 12.64

Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med (2012) 9.46

Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol (2006) 8.61

An empirical evaluation of guidelines on prostate-specific antigen velocity in prostate cancer detection. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 5.73

Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol (2008) 5.64

Circulating tumor cell number and prognosis in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 5.36

Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer (2010) 5.22

Prostate specific antigen concentration at age 60 and death or metastasis from prostate cancer: case-control study. BMJ (2010) 4.42

Differential exoprotease activities confer tumor-specific serum peptidome patterns. J Clin Invest (2006) 4.37

Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication. J Clin Oncol (2010) 4.15

Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: prediction, detection and monitoring. Nat Rev Cancer (2008) 4.15

Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS One (2009) 4.09

Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J Clin Oncol (2006) 4.05

Systematic review of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2008) 4.02

Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique. Eur Urol (2008) 3.93

Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix. J Clin Oncol (2010) 3.76

Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol (2009) 3.74

Long-term prediction of prostate cancer up to 25 years before diagnosis of prostate cancer using prostate kallikreins measured at age 44 to 50 years. J Clin Oncol (2007) 3.72

Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 3.70

Circulating tumor cell analysis in patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 3.53

Strategy for detection of prostate cancer based on relation between prostate specific antigen at age 40-55 and long term risk of metastasis: case-control study. BMJ (2013) 3.51

Long-term prediction of prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity is predictive but does not improve the predictive accuracy of a single PSA measurement 15 years or more before cancer diagnosis in a large, representative, unscreened population. J Clin Oncol (2008) 3.50

Prostate cancer mortality reduction by prostate-specific antigen-based screening adjusted for nonattendance and contamination in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur Urol (2009) 3.42

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. BMJ (2010) 3.38

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low-stage testicular germ cell tumors: a detailed pathologic study with clinical outcome analysis with special emphasis on patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Urology (2013) 3.26

Low annual caseloads of United States surgeons conducting radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2009) 3.04

Prediction of significant prostate cancer diagnosed 20 to 30 years later with a single measure of prostate-specific antigen at or before age 50. Cancer (2010) 2.90

Potential impact of postoperative early complications on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a high-volume tertiary cancer center experience. Eur Urol (2008) 2.88

The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. Clin Cancer Res (2010) 2.87

The role of SPINK1 in ETS rearrangement-negative prostate cancers. Cancer Cell (2008) 2.87

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.71

Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 2.64

Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a multi-institutional collaboration. Eur Urol (2011) 2.63

Influence of blood prostate specific antigen levels at age 60 on benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening: population based cohort study. BMJ (2014) 2.61

Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. J Urol (2008) 2.57

Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. Trials (2010) 2.54

Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading. J Urol (2006) 2.50

A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden. BMC Med (2008) 2.47

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Clin Chem (2008) 2.44

Limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies in a large cohort of elderly patients. Leuk Lymphoma (2014) 2.40

Prostate-specific antigen at or before age 50 as a predictor of advanced prostate cancer diagnosed up to 25 years later: a case-control study. BMC Med (2008) 2.39

Complications after radical and partial nephrectomy as a function of age. J Urol (2010) 2.36

Prostate-specific antigen velocity for early detection of prostate cancer: result from a large, representative, population-based cohort. Eur Urol (2009) 2.31

NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 2.31

A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the Bone Scan Index. Eur Urol (2012) 2.27

PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section. Int J Cancer (2007) 2.27

Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique? Eur Urol (2010) 2.27

Finasteride to prevent prostate cancer: should all men or only a high-risk subgroup be treated? J Clin Oncol (2010) 2.26

One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers. BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 2.24

Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology (2007) 2.23

Prostate cancer imaging trends after a nationwide effort to discourage inappropriate prostate cancer imaging. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 2.20

Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 2.19

Clinical benefits of a multivariate prediction model for bladder cancer: a decision analytic approach. Cancer (2009) 2.18

Prostate cancer mortality in areas with high and low prostate cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst (2014) 2.16

TMPRSS2-ERG status in circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker of sensitivity in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Eur Urol (2011) 2.14

A simple schema for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med (2014) 2.12

Prostate cancer early detection. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2007) 2.06

Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of free and total prostate-specific antigen in serum vs plasma after long-term storage at -20 degrees C. Clin Chem (2005) 2.05

Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and doubling time are associated with outcome but neither improves prediction of outcome beyond pretreatment PSA alone in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol (2009) 2.05

Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised trial of acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care. BMJ (2004) 2.03

N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype, occupation, and bladder cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2013) 2.01

Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm. BJU Int (2006) 2.00

Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment: Impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist. Cancer (2013) 1.98

Prostate cancer screening decreases the absolute risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer--results from a prospective, population-based randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol (2006) 1.94

Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2010) 1.93

Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer. Int J Cancer (2004) 1.93

Imaging androgen receptor signaling with a radiotracer targeting free prostate-specific antigen. Cancer Discov (2012) 1.87

Decision curve analysis: a discussion. Med Decis Making (2008) 1.87

Evaluation of multiple risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms versus prostate-specific antigen at baseline to predict prostate cancer in unscreened men. Eur Urol (2011) 1.85

Intact free prostate-specific antigen and free and total human glandular kallikrein 2. Elimination of assay interference by enzymatic digestion of antibodies to F(ab')2 fragments. Anal Chem (2006) 1.84

Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review. J Clin Oncol (2012) 1.82

Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening. Nat Rev Urol (2009) 1.76

Impact of renal impairment on eligibility for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer (2006) 1.75

Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam. Eur Urol (2013) 1.73

Prostate-specific antigen-activated thapsigargin prodrug as targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 1.73