Commentary: overcoming judicial preferences for person- versus situation-based analyses of interrogation-induced confessions.

PubWeight™: 0.75^‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 20542937)

Published in J Am Acad Psychiatry Law on January 01, 2010

Authors

Deborah Davis¹, Richard A Leo

Author Affiliations

1: Psychology Department/296 University of Nevada Reno, NV 89557, USA. debdavis@unr.edu

Articles cited by this ↗

False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law (2010) 1.39

Articles by these authors ⇆

Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations. Law Hum Behav (2009) 2.41

Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead. Law Hum Behav (2010) 0.83

Police interviewing and interrogation: a self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law Hum Behav (2007) 0.79