Current medical student interviewers add data to the evaluation of medical school applicants.

PubWeight™: 0.78‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 2883867)

Published in Med Educ Online on June 09, 2010

Authors

Christina J Gutowski1, Nikhil G Thaker, George Heinrich, Barbara Fadem

Author Affiliations

1: New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07101-5292, USA.

Articles cited by this

An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ (2004) 3.28

Description of the interview process in selecting students for admission to U.S. medical schools. J Med Educ (1981) 3.20

Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract (2001) 2.56

Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med (2003) 2.25

The interview in the admission process. Acad Med (1990) 1.63

The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med (2004) 1.62

Can we improve on how we select medical students? J R Soc Med (2002) 1.49

Contribution of medical students to admission interviews. Med Educ (2008) 1.46

The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med (2004) 1.35

A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract (2006) 1.25

Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: the contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teach Learn Med (2002) 1.24

Conditional reliability of admissions interview ratings: extreme ratings are the most informative. Med Educ (2007) 0.97

Medical student selection: choice of a semi-structured panel interview or an unstructured one-on-one interview. Med Teach (2005) 0.94

Influence of the interview on the evaluation of applicants to medical school. Acad Med (1996) 0.83

Faculty and students as admissions interviewers: results of a questionnaire given to applicants. J Med Educ (1975) 0.82

Testing for validity and bias in the use of GPA and the MCAT in the selection of medical school students. Acad Med (1990) 0.81

The medical student interviewer. Med Educ (2008) 0.78