Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions.

PubWeight™: 0.88‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 20652230)

Published in Exp Brain Res on July 23, 2010

Authors

Elizabeth A Franz1, Robert McCormick

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Lfranz@psy.otago.ac.nz

Articles cited by this

The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia (1971) 86.03

The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol (1954) 9.76

Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev (2002) 4.78

Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci (2005) 4.57

Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature (2001) 2.47

On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science (1979) 1.33

Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol (Amst) (1991) 1.17

Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychol Sci (2001) 1.17

Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1998) 1.15

Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav (1987) 1.15

Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: when a dual task becomes a single task. J Mot Behav (2001) 1.14

Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Q J Exp Psychol A (1997) 1.02

Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychol Res (1993) 1.01

Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands. Exp Brain Res (2003) 0.97

Bimanual coupling in amputees with phantom limbs. Nat Neurosci (1998) 0.97

The influence of joint position on the dynamics of perception-action coupling. Exp Brain Res (1998) 0.97

Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Exp Brain Res (2002) 0.95

Fooling the brain into thinking it sees both hands moving enhances bimanual spatial coupling. Exp Brain Res (2004) 0.92

The effect of callosotomy on novel versus familiar bimanual actions: a neural dissociation between controlled and automatic processes? Psychol Sci (2000) 0.91

Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. J Exp Psychol Gen (1980) 0.91

Attentional distribution of task paramters to the two hands during bimanual performance of right- and left-handers. J Mot Behav (2004) 0.89

Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1993) 0.87

Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing. J Neurophysiol (2005) 0.86

Bimanual coordination: constraints imposed by the relative timing of homologous muscle activation. Exp Brain Res (2003) 0.83

On the perceptual control of bimanual performance. J Mot Behav (2004) 0.79

Breaking the reflectional symmetry of interlimb coordination dynamics. J Mot Behav (1998) 0.78

The effects of attention and handedness on coordination dynamics in a bimanual Fitts' law task. Exp Brain Res (2005) 0.76

The relative effects of external spatial and motoric factors on the bimanual coordination of discrete movements. Exp Brain Res (2003) 0.75

Control is good; prediction is better? J Mot Behav (2004) 0.75