Published in Ear Hear on April 22, 2011
Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.81
Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear (2015) 0.80
Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol (2011) 0.80
Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments. Speech Commun (2013) 0.80
Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.78
Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol (2014) 0.78
Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing. Hear Res (2015) 0.75
Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.75
Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users. Hear Res (2016) 0.75
Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices. IEEE Signal Process Mag (2015) 0.75
Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science (1995) 12.57
Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res (1990) 7.86
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2001) 5.75
Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (1992) 4.66
Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am (1994) 3.65
Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. J Acoust Soc Am (1997) 2.64
Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2006) 2.21
The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. J Acoust Soc Am (1998) 2.04
A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. J Acoust Soc Am (1980) 1.99
Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. J Acoust Soc Am (2005) 1.96
Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am (1997) 1.91
Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.85
Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification. Ear Hear (2005) 1.72
Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.58
Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (2006) 1.57
Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations. J Acoust Soc Am (2004) 1.55
Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). Ear Hear (2005) 1.51
A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2005) 1.42
Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.35
A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.31
Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.30
Holes in hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol (2002) 1.26
Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.23
On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am (1992) 1.21
Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.19
Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am (1999) 1.17
Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.13
The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum. J Acoust Soc Am (2002) 1.10
Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. J Acoust Soc Am (2005) 1.07
Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI. Scand Audiol Suppl (1993) 1.01
Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.01
Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing. Ear Hear (2010) 0.91
Effect of talker and speaking style on the speech transmission index. J Acoust Soc Am (2004) 0.84
The effect of smoothing filter slope and spectral frequency on temporal speech information. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 0.83
Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 2.92
An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 2.52
Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Commun (2007) 2.43
Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear (2011) 2.13
Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.78
A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.78
Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.58
A geometric approach to spectral subtraction. Speech Commun (2008) 1.52
The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.52
Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). Ear Hear (2005) 1.51
The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues. J Acoust Soc Am (2005) 1.50
A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 1.45
A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.31
Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 1.28
A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.27
Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear (2008) 1.17
Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hear Res (2005) 1.17
Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 1.16
Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.13
The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. Int J Audiol (2012) 1.12
The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum. J Acoust Soc Am (2002) 1.10
Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.07
Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants. Hear Res (2008) 1.06
Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants. Ear Hear (2007) 1.01
Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.01
Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.01
The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L). J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.98
Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2013) 0.94
Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 0.92
Tackling the combined effects of reverberation and masking noise using ideal channel selection. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2012) 0.92
Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing. Ear Hear (2010) 0.91
A PDA platform for offline processing and streaming of stimuli for cochlear implant research. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (2011) 0.91
A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel-picking signal processors for cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2002) 0.90
Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.90
A recursive wavelet-based strategy for real-time cochlear implant speech processing on PDA platforms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2010) 0.88
Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.87
A Dual-Microphone Speech Enhancement Algorithm Based on the Coherence Function. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process (2011) 0.86
Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 0.85
Predicting the intelligibility of reverberant speech for cochlear implant listeners with a non-intrusive intelligibility measure. Biomed Signal Process Control (2013) 0.84
Selective-Tap Blind Dereverberation for Two-Microphone Enhancement of Reverberant Speech. IEEE Signal Process Lett (2009) 0.84
Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 0.83
Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.83
The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.81
Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.81
On the design and evaluation of the PDA-based research platform for electric and acoustic stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (2012) 0.81
Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.81
Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments. Speech Commun (2013) 0.80
Factors that allow a high level of speech understanding by patients fit with cochlear implants. Am J Audiol (2002) 0.80
Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 0.80
On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 0.80
Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.78
Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.78
A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (2003) 0.77
Impact of SNR and Gain-Function Over- and Under-estimation on Speech Intelligibility. Speech Commun (2012) 0.76
Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps. Ear Hear (2014) 0.76
SNR Loss: A new objective measure for predicting speech intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech. Speech Commun (2011) 0.76
On the Design of a Flexible Stimulator for Animal Studies in Auditory Prostheses. Biomed Signal Process Control (2009) 0.76
Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.75
Selective-tap blind signal processing for speech separation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (2009) 0.75
Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.75
Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.75
Estimators of The Magnitude-Squared Spectrum and Methods for Incorporating SNR Uncertainty. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process (2011) 0.75
Real-time automatic switching between noise suppression algorithms for deployment in cochlear implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (2010) 0.75
Real-time automatic tuning of noise suppression algorithms for cochlear implant applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2012) 0.75
A Laplacian-based MMSE estimator for speech enhancement. Speech Commun (2007) 0.75