Published in J Gen Intern Med on August 26, 2011
Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 2.88
Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.57
Decision making and cancer. Am Psychol (2015) 1.05
Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer. Patient (2016) 0.84
Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.82
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders. J Behav Med (2016) 0.80
Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice. Patient Prefer Adherence (2015) 0.79
Survey of Preferences in Patients Scheduled for Carpal Tunnel Release Using Conjoint Analysis. Clin Orthop Surg (2017) 0.75
Patient and Provider Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: How Does CT Colonography Compare to Other Modalities? Int J Canc Prev (2011) 0.75
Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013. Prev Chronic Dis (2016) 0.75
Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: methodological aspects and ranking tasks. Health Econ Rev (2016) 0.75
Understanding patients' preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease. World J Urol (2017) 0.75
Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA (1999) 13.20
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ (2006) 9.04
Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 7.65
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ (2000) 7.42
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 6.66
Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 5.76
Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med (2004) 5.18
Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2003) 3.80
Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med (2000) 3.61
Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making (2007) 3.02
Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One (2009) 2.97
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ (2005) 2.86
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2010) 2.75
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care (2008) 2.48
Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey. Value Health (2007) 1.86
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 1.78
Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 1.74
Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2005) 1.50
Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study. Med Decis Making (2008) 1.45
Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population. Ann Fam Med (2010) 1.26
What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J Gen Intern Med (2010) 1.17
The effects of an 'explicit' values clarification exercise in a woman's decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy. Health Expect (1999) 1.13
Effect of adding a values clarification exercise to a decision aid on heart disease prevention: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making (2010) 0.90
Randomized trial of presenting absolute v. relative risk reduction in the elicitation of patient values for heart disease prevention with conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making (2009) 0.81
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med (2011) 16.08
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of disease-modifying medications for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 4.12
Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol (2007) 3.49
Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med (2005) 3.34
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) (2011) 3.24
A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 2.89
Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 2.88
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ (2005) 2.86
Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med (2010) 2.82
Influence of surgical manipulation on prostate gene expression: implications for molecular correlates of treatment effects and disease prognosis. J Clin Oncol (2006) 2.56
A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. J Gen Intern Med (2003) 2.49
Outcomes and costs of community health worker interventions: a systematic review. Med Care (2010) 2.48
The value of sharing treatment decision making with patients: expecting too much? JAMA (2013) 2.48
Screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2014) 2.41
Acceptance of a Polypill approach to prevent cardiovascular disease among a sample of U.S. physicians. Prev Med (2010) 2.36
Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study. BMJ (2013) 2.25
Global risk of coronary heart disease: assessment and application. Am Fam Physician (2010) 2.21
"Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 2.15
Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis (2012) 1.97
Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med (2007) 1.93
Systematic evaluation of candidate blood markers for detecting ovarian cancer. PLoS One (2008) 1.93
Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2007) 1.84
Transitional care interventions to prevent readmissions for persons with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2014) 1.78
Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med (2012) 1.76
Patient views about treatment of stage 5 CKD: a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews. Am J Kidney Dis (2010) 1.74
Estimates of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer associated with screening mammography. Cancer Causes Control (2009) 1.72
Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging (2008) 1.72
DNA methylation profiles of ovarian epithelial carcinoma tumors and cell lines. PLoS One (2010) 1.65
Interventions to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2013) 1.64
How do we achieve informed choice for women considering breast screening? Prev Med (2011) 1.62
Optimizing the frequency of follow-up visits for patients treated for localized primary cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol (2011) 1.62
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.61
Antiviral therapy for hepatitis B-related liver cancer prevention is more cost-effective than cancer screening. J Hepatol (2009) 1.61
Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.57
Combining results of microarray experiments: a rank aggregation approach. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol (2006) 1.56
Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med (2005) 1.49
Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 1.48
Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2012) 1.48
A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med (2012) 1.47
Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis. Dig Dis Sci (2013) 1.46
Use of global coronary heart disease risk assessment in practice: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of U.S. physicians. BMC Health Serv Res (2012) 1.44
Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease. CMAJ (2012) 1.43
Comparative survival and economic benefits of deceased donor kidney transplantation and dialysis in people with varying ages and co-morbidities. PLoS One (2012) 1.42
Differential expression of angiogenesis associated genes in prostate cancer bone, liver and lymph node metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis (2007) 1.41
The relative benefits and costs of solid phase bead technology to detect preformed donor specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies in determining suitability for kidney transplantation. Transplantation (2015) 1.40
Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis (2008) 1.39
The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial. Implement Sci (2008) 1.36
The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study. J Urol (2011) 1.33
Community preferences for the allocation of solid organs for transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation (2010) 1.26
The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 1.18
Costs and cost-effectiveness of full implementation of a biennial faecal occult blood test screening program for bowel cancer in Australia. Med J Aust (2011) 1.18
Information needs of men regarding prostate cancer screening and the effect of a brief decision aid. Patient Educ Couns (2004) 1.18
The interface between residential aged care and the emergency department: a systematic review. Age Ageing (2010) 1.16
Auriculotherapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med (2010) 1.15
Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2011) 1.14
Enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) (2010) 1.14
Nephrologists' perspectives on waitlisting and allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplant. Am J Kidney Dis (2011) 1.13
Heart to Heart: a computerized decision aid for assessment of coronary heart disease risk and the impact of risk-reduction interventions for primary prevention. Prev Cardiol (2004) 1.13
Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2013) 1.08
Characteristics of dialysis important to patients and family caregivers: a mixed methods approach. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2011) 1.08
What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening? CA Cancer J Clin (2013) 1.06
Multiplex targeted proteomic assay for biomarker detection in plasma: a pancreatic cancer biomarker case study. J Proteome Res (2012) 1.06
Organizational change: a way to increase colon, breast and cervical cancer screening in primary care practices. J Community Health (2011) 1.06
Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Pediatr (2009) 1.03
Analyzing patterns of staining in immunohistochemical studies: application to a study of prostate cancer recurrence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2005) 1.02
Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter? J Clin Oncol (2007) 1.02
The contributions of normal variation and genetic background to mammalian gene expression. Genome Biol (2006) 1.01
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry (2014) 1.01
Cervical cancer screening in Australia: modelled evaluation of the impact of changing the recommended interval from two to three years. BMC Public Health (2010) 1.00
Patients who plan for conservative care rather than dialysis: a national observational study in Australia. Am J Kidney Dis (2011) 0.98
Patient INformation about Options for Treatment (PINOT): a prospective national study of information given to incident CKD Stage 5 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2010) 0.97
Kappa statistic for clustered dichotomous responses from physicians and patients. Stat Med (2013) 0.97
The cost-effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared with facility haemodialysis: a systematic review of full economic evaluations. Nephrology (Carlton) (2014) 0.96
Low-fat, low-glycemic load diet and gene expression in human prostate epithelium: a feasibility study of using cDNA microarrays to assess the response to dietary intervention in target tissues. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2007) 0.95
Telomerase activity in disseminated prostate cancer cells. BJU Int (2006) 0.95
Important outcomes for kidney transplant recipients: a nominal group and qualitative study. Am J Kidney Dis (2012) 0.95
Exercise therapy for prevention of falls in people with Parkinson's disease: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMC Neurol (2009) 0.95
Decision to transfer to an emergency department from residential aged care: a systematic review of qualitative research. Geriatr Gerontol Int (2013) 0.94
Methodology of a pilot study to improve the quality of medication use in older adults: Enhancing Quality in Psychiatry Using Pharmacists (EQUIPP). Am J Geriatr Pharmacother (2009) 0.94
Promoting decision aid use in primary care using a staff member for delivery. Patient Educ Couns (2011) 0.94
Loss of stearoyl-CoA desaturase expression is a frequent event in prostate carcinoma. Int J Cancer (2005) 0.94
Maximizing informed cancer screening decisions. Arch Intern Med (2007) 0.93
Promoting prostate-specific antigen informed decision-making. Evaluating two community-level interventions. Am J Prev Med (2008) 0.93
Quality of life of young adults and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. J Pediatr (2013) 0.92
Using quality improvement techniques to increase colon cancer screening. Am J Med (2009) 0.92
Pilot study of blood biomarker candidates for detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas (2010) 0.92
Cancer screening practices among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors: results from the 2001 and 2003 California health interview survey. J Cancer Surviv (2009) 0.92
Integrating evidence and individual preferences using a web-based multi-criteria decision analytic tool: an application to prostate cancer screening. Patient (2011) 0.92
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and cancer screening among female Medicare beneficiaries. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2013) 0.91
A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial. Aust Health Rev (2013) 0.90
Community attitudes to deceased organ donation: a focus group study. Transplantation (2012) 0.90
IGF-I and IGFBP-3 polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer. Prostate (2005) 0.89
Practice-based interventions addressing concomitant depression and chronic medical conditions in the primary care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prim Care Community Health (2013) 0.89
What determines adherence to treatment in cardiovascular disease prevention? Protocol for a mixed methods preference study. BMJ Open (2011) 0.89
The Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer (SPANC): design and methods of a three-year prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health (2013) 0.89
Supporting shared decisions when clinical evidence is low. Med Care Res Rev (2012) 0.89
Ticagrelor versus genotype-driven antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Value Health (2011) 0.88