Published in Anal Bioanal Chem on November 10, 2011
Fluorescence-Based Bioassays for the Detection and Evaluation of Food Materials. Sensors (Basel) (2015) 0.75
Review of methods for the detection and quantification of adulteration of rice: Basmati as a case study. J Food Sci Technol (2014) 0.75
The gene for fragrance in rice. Plant Biotechnol J (2005) 1.76
Linear-after-the-exponential (LATE)-PCR: an advanced method of asymmetric PCR and its uses in quantitative real-time analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2004) 1.69
The origin and evolution of fragrance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 1.61
Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome (2000) 1.56
Genetic and molecular basis of fragrance in rice. Biotechnol Adv (2009) 1.11
Diagnostic application of padlock probes--multiplex detection of plant pathogens using universal microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res (2005) 1.11
Is there a second fragrance gene in rice? Plant Biotechnol J (2008) 1.04
Dosage Effect of the Spelta Gene Q of Hexaploid Wheat. Genetics (1963) 0.98
Optimised padlock probe ligation and microarray detection of multiple (non-authorised) GMOs in a single reaction. BMC Genomics (2008) 0.89
Capillary electrophoresis is essential for microsatellite marker based detection and quantification of adulteration of Basmati rice (Oryza sativa). J Agric Food Chem (2007) 0.87
DNA microsatellite region for a reliable quantification of soft wheat adulteration in durum wheat-based foodstuffs by real-time PCR. J Agric Food Chem (2009) 0.83
Genotyping of the Q locus in wheat by a simple PCR-RFLP method. Genes Genet Syst (2009) 0.81
Detection of soft wheat in semolina and durum wheat bread by analysis of DNA microsatellites. J Agric Food Chem (2007) 0.80
Ninety-day oral toxicity studies on two genetically modified maize MON810 varieties in Wistar Han RCC rats (EU 7th Framework Programme project GRACE). Arch Toxicol (2014) 2.91
Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Plant Biotechnol J (2010) 1.32
Sensitivity and speed of induced defense of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.): dynamics of BoLOX expression patterns during insect and pathogen attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact (2007) 1.07
New EU legislation for risk assessment of GM food: no scientific justification for mandatory animal feeding trials. Plant Biotechnol J (2013) 1.01
Detecting authorized and unauthorized genetically modified organisms containing vip3A by real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing. Anal Bioanal Chem (2014) 0.97
PVY(NTN) elicits a diverse gene expression response in different potato genotypes in the first 12 h after inoculation. Mol Plant Pathol (2009) 0.97
Exploitation of molecular profiling techniques for GM food safety assessment. Curr Opin Biotechnol (2003) 0.93
Transcriptome analysis of potato tubers--effects of different agricultural practices. J Agric Food Chem (2009) 0.91
Optimised padlock probe ligation and microarray detection of multiple (non-authorised) GMOs in a single reaction. BMC Genomics (2008) 0.89
Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: examples in potato and maize. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol (2010) 0.86
Traceability of genetically modified organisms. Expert Rev Mol Diagn (2002) 0.85
The identification and interpretation of differences in the transcriptomes of organically and conventionally grown potato tubers. J Agric Food Chem (2012) 0.84
Substantial equivalence--an appropriate paradigm for the safety assessment of genetically modified foods? Toxicology (2002) 0.84
Development and validation of real-time PCR screening methods for detection of cry1A.105 and cry2Ab2 genes in genetically modified organisms. Anal Bioanal Chem (2011) 0.83
A high-throughput method for GMO multi-detection using a microfluidic dynamic array. Anal Bioanal Chem (2013) 0.81
Comparison and transfer testing of multiplex ligation detection methods for GM plants. BMC Biotechnol (2012) 0.75
Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. Food Nutr Bull (2005) 0.75
DNA methods: critical review of innovative approaches. J AOAC Int (2002) 0.75