Do pharmaceutical score cards give us the answers we seek?

PubWeight™: 1.43‹?› | Rank: Top 5%

🔗 View Article (PMID 22143855)

Published in N Z Med J on November 25, 2011

Authors

Peter Moodie1, Scott Metcalfe, Matthew Poynton

Author Affiliations

1: PHARMAC, PO Box 10-254, Wellington, New Zealand. peter.moodie@pharmac.govt.nz

Articles cited by this

Access to new medicines in New Zealand compared to Australia. N Z Med J (2011) 1.98

Articles by these authors

PHARMAC responds on long-acting insulin analogues. N Z Med J (2005) 1.53

Going against the flow: the impact of PHARMAC not funding COX-2 inhibitors for chronic arthritis. N Z Med J (2005) 1.53

Variation in the use of medicines by ethnicity during 2006/07 in New Zealand: a preliminary analysis. N Z Med J (2013) 1.40

PHARMAC and tobacco control in New Zealand: two licensed funded options are already available. N Z Med J (2005) 1.40

PHARMAC's response on temozolomide and funding costly medicines that prolong life shortly. N Z Med J (2005) 1.39

Terminations of pregnancy associated with isotretinoin use in New Zealand. N Z Med J (2011) 1.39

Climate science, denial and the Declaration of Delhi. N Z Med J (2009) 1.39

Direct-to-consumer advertising--yes it can compromise patient health. N Z Med J (2003) 1.39

PHARMAC responds to Richard Milne on discounting health benefits and costs. N Z Med J (2005) 1.36

Health and equity impacts of climate change in Aotearoa-New Zealand, and health gains from climate action. N Z Med J (2014) 0.99

PHARMAC responds to Stewart Mann on dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists. N Z Med J (2005) 0.97

Our advice? Get a budget! Healthc Pap (2002) 0.94

Old letters, new rules. Lancet (2003) 0.93

National prescribing data for dabigatran. N Z Med J (2012) 0.85

Response from PHARMAC: difficult choices. N Z Med J (2003) 0.84

Systematic review of celecoxib for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Celecoxib's relative gastrointestinal safety is overstated. BMJ (2003) 0.81

Assessing the value for money of pharmaceuticals in New Zealand--PHARMAC's approach to cost-utility analysis. N Z Med J (2013) 0.80

Seretide meta-analysis missed important features and overstates any advantages over concurrent LABA/ICS devices. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2004) 0.79

PHARMAC responds on Herceptin assumptions and decisions. N Z Med J (2007) 0.78

PHARMAC responds on salbutamol. N Z Med J (2005) 0.76

PHARMAC responds on long-acting inhalers for COPD. N Z Med J (2005) 0.76

PHARMAC and EpiPen for anaphylaxis. N Z Med J (2006) 0.75

PHARMAC and statins--correction is needed. N Z Med J (2007) 0.75

PHARMAC and erythropoietin for cancer patients. N Z Med J (2006) 0.75

PHARMAC's response on gemcitabine and transparency. N Z Med J (2005) 0.75

PHARMAC and statins--getting the best population health gains. N Z Med J (2006) 0.75

Funding a clinical trial: the perspective of a medicines funder. Pharmacoeconomics (2008) 0.75

More on PHARMAC and tobacco control in New Zealand. N Z Med J (2006) 0.75

PHARMAC responds on agents to prevent osteoporotic fractures. N Z Med J (2006) 0.75

PHARMAC responds on treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Z Med J (2005) 0.75

PHARMAC responds on TNF inhibitors for inflammatory arthritis. N Z Med J (2005) 0.75

Balancing the risks and benefits of celecoxib. Am J Med (2007) 0.75

Child abuse in Australian camps-whose business, and who should speak out? N Z Med J (2016) 0.75

PHARMAC has no cost-effectiveness threshold. N Z Med J (2012) 0.75

New Zealand's emissions trading scheme and health: wasting our opportunities. N Z Med J (2008) 0.75

Usage and equity of access to isotretinoin in New Zealand by deprivation and ethnicity. N Z Med J (2011) 0.75

PHARMAC's updated guidelines for cost-utility analyses, with new QALYs per $1M metric. N Z Med J (2012) 0.75

PHARMAC's updated guidelines for cost-effectiveness analyses, with new discount rate. N Z Med J (2007) 0.75

Sign On--prescribing for climate health. N Z Med J (2009) 0.75

Specific oral contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism resulting in hospital admission. N Z Med J (2004) 0.75

PHARMAC welcomes debate. N Z Med J (2005) 0.75