Does attentional selectivity in the flanker task improve discretely or gradually?

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3481116)

Published in Front Psychol on October 26, 2012

Authors

Ronald Hübner1, Lisa Töbel

Author Affiliations

1: Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Konstanz Konstanz, Germany.

Articles cited by this

Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev (2001) 21.52

Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol (1980) 19.05

Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol (1980) 7.51

A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev (2004) 5.58

Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen (1992) 5.31

Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci (2003) 3.57

Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept Psychophys (1986) 3.23

Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1988) 2.73

Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys (1979) 1.97

Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen (1994) 1.52

A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. Am J Psychol (1992) 1.46

Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Front Psychol (2010) 1.34

Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cogn Psychol (2011) 1.26

A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychol Rev (2010) 1.26

Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2009) 1.24

Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control. J Exp Psychol Gen (2007) 1.20

A neural network model of the Eriksen task: reduction, analysis, and data fitting. Neural Comput (2008) 0.99

A computational study of conflict-monitoring at two levels of processing: reaction time distributional analyses and hemodynamic responses. Brain Res (2007) 0.90

Dynamical analysis of Bayesian inference models for the Eriksen task. Neural Comput (2009) 0.87

Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation? Acta Psychol (Amst) (2011) 0.83

A test of Bayesian observer models of processing in the Eriksen flanker task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2011) 0.79