Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.

PubWeight™: 1.52‹?› | Rank: Top 4%

🔗 View Article (PMC 3515652)

Published in Ann Intern Med on November 06, 2012

Authors

Amy B Knudsen1, Chin Hur, G Scott Gazelle, Deborah Schrag, Elizabeth G McFarland, Karen M Kuntz

Author Affiliations

1: Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA. aknudsen@mgh-ita.org

Articles cited by this

Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2008) 16.82

Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med (2012) 16.55

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology (2008) 15.86

Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med (2003) 15.53

Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med (2008) 15.51

Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2010) 15.50

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology (2003) 14.67

The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med (2000) 13.19

Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med (2012) 11.48

Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med (2008) 9.32

Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst (1999) 8.08

Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 7.85

Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2008) 6.99

Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 6.50

Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA (2006) 6.26

Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 6.21

Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.03

Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2011) 5.72

Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med (2006) 5.10

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology (2006) 4.57

Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med (2008) 4.55

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin (2001) 4.41

Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology (2008) 3.71

Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.71

Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med (2009) 3.34

Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut (1982) 3.23

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 3.05

The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study. Cancer (1982) 2.85

Adenomatous polypi of large intestine: incidence and distribution. Ann Surg (1963) 2.74

Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011) 2.62

INCIDENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ADENOMATOUS POLYPS OF THE COLON AND RECTUM BASED ON 1,000 AUTOPSY EXAMINATIONS. Dis Colon Rectum (1964) 2.54

Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut (2002) 2.50

Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer (1979) 2.41

Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2012) 2.31

Predictors of presence, multiplicity, size and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas. A necropsy study in New Zealand. Gut (1992) 2.15

Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds. Scand J Gastroenterol (2004) 2.14

Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer. Int J Cancer (1985) 2.08

Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology (2006) 2.04

Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care. Med Care (2005) 1.94

Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. Br J Cancer (2009) 1.93

Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology (2011) 1.81

Polyps of the large intestine in Aarhus, Denmark. An autopsy study. Scand J Gastroenterol (1989) 1.79

A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression. Med Decis Making (2011) 1.77

Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 1.74

Clarifying differences in natural history between models of screening: the case of colorectal cancer. Med Decis Making (2011) 1.71

Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut (2006) 1.61

Polyps of the colon in Barcelona, Spain. An autopsy study. Cancer (1988) 1.57

Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med (2010) 1.24

CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 1.18

Longitudinal adherence to fecal occult blood testing impacts colorectal cancer screening quality. Am J Gastroenterol (2011) 1.16

Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2011) 1.07

The economic burden of incidentally detected findings. Radiol Clin North Am (2011) 1.03

Impact of a CT colonography screening program on endoscopic colonoscopy in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 0.95

Analysis of barriers to and patients' preferences for CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in a nonadherent urban population. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 0.79

Articles by these authors

Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care (2002) 21.63

Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med (2004) 12.23

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics (2008) 12.10

Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. N Engl J Med (2012) 10.93

Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 8.36

Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol (2005) 8.08

Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med (2002) 7.26

American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2004) 7.16

Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med (2002) 7.00

Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2008) 6.99

Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 6.98

American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care. J Clin Oncol (2009) 6.77

Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance. N Engl J Med (2007) 6.74

The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 6.12

Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches. Cancer (2005) 5.56

Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients: a study design that should be laid to rest. JAMA (2004) 5.43

Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology (2003) 5.42

Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol (2010) 5.21

Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 5.05

A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol (2007) 4.81

Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med (2012) 4.72

Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. JAMA (2004) 4.36

The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist (2013) 4.33

Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen. N Engl J Med (2003) 4.30

Survival of blacks and whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA (2002) 4.27

How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol (2008) 4.24

Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Arch Intern Med (2010) 4.11

Religious coping and use of intensive life-prolonging care near death in patients with advanced cancer. JAMA (2009) 4.04

The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med (2003) 4.01

Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique. Eur Urol (2008) 3.93

Missed opportunities: racial disparities in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol (2006) 3.83

Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol (2006) 3.75

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed after age 75 years. J Clin Oncol (2012) 3.63

Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (2007) 3.60

When you look matters: the effect of assessment schedule on progression-free survival. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 3.60

Primary care physicians' links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination. Ann Intern Med (2009) 3.59

Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care (2002) 3.57

Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA (2005) 3.53

Survival outcomes after radiation therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after adoption of computed tomography-based simulation. J Clin Oncol (2011) 3.53

CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology (2005) 3.43

Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA (2011) 3.41

Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden. Arch Intern Med (2010) 3.40

Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 3.33

Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (2005) 3.29

Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 3.19

American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin (2013) 3.16

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 3.05

Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med (2003) 3.01

Adjuvant chemotherapy use and adverse events among older patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA (2010) 2.93

Estimating the energy gap among US children: a counterfactual approach. Pediatrics (2006) 2.93

Palliative radiation therapy practice in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS) Study. J Clin Oncol (2013) 2.91

Risks and benefits of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2006) 2.88

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States. J Thorac Oncol (2011) 2.83

HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol (2004) 2.78

Treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or cancer: predictors of surgical versus endoscopic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 2.74

Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg (2002) 2.71

American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol (2008) 2.69

How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.? Mortality projections for scenarios of risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer (2006) 2.68

Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with prosthetic joints: Comparisons of antibiotic regimens for patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Am Dent Assoc (2015) 2.60

Effectiveness of bevacizumab with first-line combination chemotherapy for Medicare patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol (2012) 2.59

Carboplatin and paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA (2012) 2.56

Cost-effectiveness of aspirin chemoprevention for Barrett's esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 2.53

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 2.52

Optimizing adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: a decision analysis. J Clin Oncol (2005) 2.52

Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol (2007) 2.49

Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making (2007) 2.46

Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Brain (2012) 2.43

Delivering high-quality and affordable care throughout the cancer care continuum. J Clin Oncol (2013) 2.39

Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2012) 2.39

Estimating long-term effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the Mayo CT screening study. Radiology (2008) 2.37

Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in older women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: assessing outcome in a population-based, observational cohort. J Clin Oncol (2006) 2.32

Impact of reduced tobacco smoking on lung cancer mortality in the United States during 1975-2000. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 2.30

Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg (2006) 2.25

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases in potential candidates for resection: the "test-of-time approach". Cancer (2003) 2.22

Models in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med (2014) 2.18

Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--1. Value Health (2012) 2.14

Prognostic gene expression signature for patients with hepatitis C-related early-stage cirrhosis. Gastroenterology (2013) 2.13

Forecasting the obesity epidemic in the aging U.S. population. Obesity (Silver Spring) (2007) 2.09

Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.04

Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med (2009) 2.01

Prominent phenotypic variability associated with mutations in Progranulin. Neurobiol Aging (2007) 2.00

The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg (2004) 1.97

Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer (2004) 1.93

State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3. Value Health (2012) 1.90

Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2007) 1.89

Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 1.87

The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975-1999. Cancer (2005) 1.86

Cancer screening among patients with advanced cancer. JAMA (2010) 1.82

Comparison of approaches for estimating incidence costs of care for colorectal cancer patients. Med Care (2009) 1.76

Patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy use in a population-based cohort of patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2011) 1.75

Use of surgery among elderly patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol (2004) 1.74

Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in adults with severe asthma: results from the Asthma Policy Model. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2007) 1.73

Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology (2003) 1.73

Clarifying differences in natural history between models of screening: the case of colorectal cancer. Med Decis Making (2011) 1.71

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays. J Clin Oncol (2011) 1.71

Cost-effective diagnostic checklists for meningitis in resource-limited settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (2013) 1.71

Attribution of deaths following cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 1.63

Comparison of approaches for estimating prevalence costs of care for cancer patients: what is the impact of data source? Med Care (2009) 1.62