Can the Surgical Apgar Score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?

PubWeight™: 0.81‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3508032)

Published in Int Orthop on November 06, 2012

Authors

Julio Urrutia1, Macarena Valdes, Tomas Zamora, Valentina Canessa, Jorge Briceno

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Marcoleta 352, Santiago, Chile. jurrutia@med.puc.cl

Articles cited by this

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 1991-2008. JAMA (2011) 3.09

An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 2.50

Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study. Br J Surg (1995) 1.81

Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries. Surgery (2011) 1.74

Expansion of the surgical Apgar score across all surgical subspecialties as a means to predict postoperative mortality. Anesthesiology (2011) 1.66

Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications? Am J Med Qual (2002) 1.31

Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg (2009) 1.24

An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2002) 1.04

The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery (2010) 1.01

Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital. World J Surg (2012) 1.00

The Surgical Apgar Score in hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 0.94

Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy. J Urol (2009) 0.93

Assessment of the Surgical Apgar Score in a Swedish setting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (2011) 0.90

"Surgical Apgar Score" predicts postoperative complications after cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2009) 0.85

Outcome in elderly injured patients: injury severity versus host factors. Injury (1998) 0.81

Articles by these authors

An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2015) 1.10

Cervical pyogenic spinal infections: are they more severe diseases than infections in other vertebral locations? Eur Spine J (2013) 0.87

Thoracic scoliosis prevalence in patients 50 years or older and its relationship with age, sex, and thoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2014) 0.83

The fifty most cited Latin-American articles in the orthopaedic literature. Int Orthop (2013) 0.83

An Independent Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation of the AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2017) 0.82

Low anonymous voting compliance with the novel policy for managing conflicts of interest implemented in the 9th version of the American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic guidelines. Chest (2013) 0.82

Does Pathogen Identification Influence the Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Pyogenic Spinal Infections? J Spinal Disord Tech (2015) 0.79

Effect of a single dose of pamidronate administered at the time of surgery in a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model. Eur Spine J (2010) 0.77

Do corticosteroids affect lumbar spinal fusion? A rabbit model using high-dose methylprednisolone. J Orthop Sci (2011) 0.76

Does the Prevalence of Spondylolysis and Spina Bifida Occulta Observed in Pediatric Patients Remain Stable in Adults? Clin Spine Surg (2017) 0.75