Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort.

PubWeight™: 4.04‹?› | Rank: Top 1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 23460710)

Published in J Clin Oncol on March 04, 2013

Authors

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Jeffry P Simko, Janet E Cowan, Julia E Reid, Azita Djalilvand, Satish Bhatnagar, Alexander Gutin, Jerry S Lanchbury, Gregory P Swanson, Steven Stone, Peter R Carroll

Author Affiliations

1: University of California, San Francisco, Box 1695, 1600 Divisadero St, A-624, San Francisco, CA 94143-1695, USA. mcooperberg@urology.ucsf.edu

Articles citing this

Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future. Ther Adv Urol (2013) 1.48

Validation of Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Progression by the Combination of Bioinformatics, Clinical and Functional Studies. PLoS One (2016) 1.42

High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2014) 1.18

Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new? Curr Opin Oncol (2014) 1.16

Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Genet (2016) 1.12

Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort. Eur Urol (2014) 1.09

Seventh Joint Meeting of K-J-CaP and CaPSURE: extending the global initiative to improve prostate cancer management. Prostate Int (2014) 1.08

Prognostic DNA methylation markers for prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2014) 1.05

An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy. Br J Radiol (2014) 1.04

Identification of proteomic biomarkers predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness and lethality despite biopsy-sampling error. Br J Cancer (2014) 0.98

Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer (2015) 0.95

Prognostic prostate tissue biomarkers of potential clinical use. Virchows Arch (2014) 0.95

Reduced expression of PinX1 correlates to progressive features in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Cell Int (2014) 0.93

The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements. Biomark Cancer (2016) 0.92

Low-grade prostate cancer diverges early from high grade and metastatic disease. Cancer Sci (2014) 0.90

Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies. PLoS One (2015) 0.86

PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers. Cell Oncol (Dordr) (2016) 0.86

Proteomic approaches in biomarker discovery: new perspectives in cancer diagnostics. ScientificWorldJournal (2014) 0.85

Applying precision medicine to the active surveillance of prostate cancer. Cancer (2015) 0.85

The prognostic value of SUMO1/Sentrin specific peptidase 1 (SENP1) in prostate cancer is limited to ERG-fusion positive tumors lacking PTEN deletion. BMC Cancer (2015) 0.84

How Precisely Can Prostate Cancer Be Managed? Int Neurourol J (2016) 0.83

Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes. Eur Urol (2015) 0.83

Very High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Outcomes Following Definitive Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2015) 0.81

Clinically available RNA profiling tests of prostate tumors: utility and comparison. Asian J Androl (2016) 0.81

Risk stratification of prostate cancer in the modern era. Curr Opin Urol (2015) 0.80

What is the Need for Prostatic Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Management? Curr Urol Rep (2015) 0.80

Influence of (11)C-choline PET/CT on radiotherapy planning in prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother (2014) 0.80

Expression of cell cycle-regulated genes and prostate cancer prognosis in a population-based cohort. Prostate (2015) 0.79

Effect of a low-fat fish oil diet on proinflammatory eicosanoids and cell-cycle progression score in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2013) 0.79

Personalized prostate cancer care: from screening to treatment. Asian J Androl (2016) 0.79

Open tubular lab-on-column/mass spectrometry for targeted proteomics of nanogram sample amounts. PLoS One (2014) 0.79

Prostate Radiotherapy in the Era of Advanced Imaging and Precision Medicine. Prostate Cancer (2016) 0.78

Re: Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort. J Urol (2013) 0.78

Can contemporary patients with biopsy Gleason score 3+4 be eligible for active surveillance? PLoS One (2014) 0.78

The Role of Proteomics in Biomarker Development for Improved Patient Diagnosis and Clinical Decision Making in Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) (2016) 0.77

Biomarkers for prostate cancer: present challenges and future opportunities. Future Sci OA (2015) 0.77

The changing role of imaging in clinical care. Nat Rev Urol (2014) 0.77

Dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor and semaphorin ligand-receptor families in prostate cancer metastasis. BMC Syst Biol (2015) 0.77

Gene expression panel predicts metastatic-lethal prostate cancer outcomes in men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer. Mol Oncol (2016) 0.77

RNA biomarkers to facilitate the identification of aggressive prostate cancer. Mol Aspects Med (2015) 0.76

Multi-transcript profiling in archival diagnostic prostate cancer needle biopsies to evaluate biomarkers in non-surgically treated men. BMC Cancer (2014) 0.76

Nanowire analysis of cancer-testis antigens as biomarkers of aggressive prostate cancer. Urology (2015) 0.76

Potential Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Biomed Res Int (2015) 0.76

Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics. BMC Med (2016) 0.76

Active surveillance monitoring: the role of novel biomarkers and imaging. Asian J Androl (2015) 0.75

Chitooligosaccharides promote radiosensitivity in colon cancer line SW480. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 0.75

Novel concepts for risk stratification in prostate cancer. J Clin Urol (2016) 0.75

A four gene signature predictive of recurrent prostate cancer. Oncotarget (2016) 0.75

Contemporary Management of Prostate Cancer. F1000Res (2016) 0.75

Autoantibodies against oncogenic ERG protein in prostate cancer: potential use in diagnosis and prognosis in a panel with C-MYC, AMACR and HERV-K Gag. Genes Cancer (2016) 0.75

Genetic classifiers for prostate cancer: A new era on the horizon? Korean J Urol (2015) 0.75

Qualitative and Quantitative Requirements for Assessing Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer. Microarrays (Basel) (2014) 0.75

Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer. Oncologist (2015) 0.75

Re: validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort. Eur Urol (2014) 0.75

The need for a personalized approach for prostate cancer management. BMC Med (2015) 0.75

Urological cancer: Genetic marker to guide treatment? Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2013) 0.75

Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2016) 0.75

Is clinical stage T2c prostate cancer an intermediate- or high-risk disease? Cancer (2014) 0.75

Clinically relevant genetic characterization of prostate tumors: how close are we to the goal? Korean J Urol (2015) 0.75

Integrated analysis of the prostate cancer small-nucleolar transcriptome reveals SNORA55 as a driver of prostate cancer progression. Mol Oncol (2015) 0.75

Prognostic correlation of cell cycle progression score and Ki-67 as a predictor of aggressiveness, biochemical failure, and mortality in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother (2017) 0.75

Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort. Oncotarget (2017) 0.75

Utilization of individualized prostate cancer and genomic biomarkers for the practicing urologist. Rev Urol (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science (2002) 21.26

Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 8.93

The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet (2010) 8.07

Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol (2002) 6.69

Androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer and the risk of cardiovascular mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 5.69

A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS One (2007) 5.62

Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 5.45

Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer (2010) 5.22

The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol (2004) 5.09

National practice patterns and time trends in androgen ablation for localized prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 4.81

Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Cancer (2008) 4.77

The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry. J Urol (2004) 4.66

Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol (2007) 4.56

Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol (2011) 4.50

Surrogate end point for prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 4.42

The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2005) 4.40

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol (2012) 4.24

Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA (2011) 3.92

The changing face of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2005) 3.84

Increased telomerase activity and comprehensive lifestyle changes: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol (2008) 3.57

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2012) 3.26

Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer (2008) 3.18

Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer: likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes. Cancer (2008) 3.14

Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes? Am J Surg Pathol (2012) 3.05

Hazard ratio in clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2004) 2.95

Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol (2003) 2.93

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.93

Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival. J Clin Oncol (2010) 2.89

Factors associated with satisfaction with prostate cancer care: results from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). BJU Int (2012) 2.88

Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2009) 2.88

Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 2.84

Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol (2012) 2.84

Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer (2008) 2.83

The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Cancer (2011) 2.78

Sequence variants in the genes for the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) and its ligand (IL12B) confer protection against psoriasis. Hum Genet (2007) 2.78

Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol (2003) 2.77

Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome. JAMA (2006) 2.73

Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 2.70

Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. J Urol (2007) 2.69

Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 2.65

Incidence and outcome of BRCA mutations in unselected patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 2.64

Adjuvant androgen deprivation for high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: SWOG S9921 study. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.57

Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.55

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2012) 2.55

PTEN, PIK3CA, p-AKT, and p-p70S6K status: association with trastuzumab response and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Am J Pathol (2010) 2.52

Identification of ZNF313/RNF114 as a novel psoriasis susceptibility gene. Hum Mol Genet (2008) 2.42

Prepubertal orchiopexy for cryptorchidism may be associated with lower risk of testicular cancer. J Urol (2007) 2.39

Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol (2009) 2.39

Prognostic utility of cell cycle progression score in men with prostate cancer after primary external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2013) 2.35

NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 2.31

The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2011) 2.29

Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (capsure). J Urol (2004) 2.23

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Cancer (2009) 2.21

Clarifying the diffuse gliomas: an update on the morphologic features and markers that discriminate oligodendroglioma from astrocytoma. Am J Clin Pathol (2005) 2.17

TBC1D1 is a candidate for a severe obesity gene and evidence for a gene/gene interaction in obesity predisposition. Hum Mol Genet (2006) 2.15

Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.08

Prostate cancer early detection. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2007) 2.06

Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol (2005) 2.05

Quantitative analysis of prostate metabolites using 1H HR-MAS spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med (2006) 2.04

Androgen-deprivation therapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: data from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). Cancer (2006) 2.04

Epigenetic changes in prostate cancer: implication for diagnosis and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.03

What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database. J Urol (2008) 2.02

Low incidence of perioperative chemotherapy for stage III bladder cancer 1998 to 2003: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Urol (2007) 2.01

Increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer among infertile men. Cancer (2010) 2.00

Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2004) 1.98

Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer (2006) 1.97

Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 1.95

Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol (2003) 1.93

The relationship between anxiety and time to treatment for patients with prostate cancer on surveillance. J Urol (2007) 1.91

Contemporary patterns of androgen deprivation therapy use for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Urology (2002) 1.90

Proton HR-MAS spectroscopy and quantitative pathologic analysis of MRI/3D-MRSI-targeted postsurgical prostate tissues. Magn Reson Med (2003) 1.89

Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement. J Urol (2010) 1.85

High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007. World J Urol (2008) 1.83

Genetic mapping in the presence of genotyping errors. Genetics (2007) 1.81

Intensive lifestyle changes may affect the progression of prostate cancer. J Urol (2005) 1.81

Whole genome scanning identifies genotypes associated with recurrence and metastasis in prostate tumors. Hum Mol Genet (2004) 1.80

Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol (2004) 1.80

Association of the FTO gene with BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring) (2008) 1.79

Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer (2014) 1.79

Comorbidity and primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: data from CaPSURE. J Urol (2006) 1.77