Clinical performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives, %p2PSA and the prostate health index (PHI), in men with a family history of prostate cancer: results from a multicentre European study, the PROMEtheuS project.

PubWeight™: 1.10‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMID 23826841)

Published in BJU Int on August 01, 2013

Authors

Massimo Lazzeri1, Alexander Haese, Alberto Abrate, Alexandre de la Taille, Joan Palou Redorta, Thomas McNicholas, Giovanni Lughezzani, Giuliana Lista, Alessandro Larcher, Vittorio Bini, Andrea Cestari, Nicolòmaria Buffi, Markus Graefen, Olivier Bosset, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Alberto Breda, Pablo de la Torre, Linda Fowler, Jacques Roux, Giorgio Guazzoni

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Urology, Ospedale San Raffaele Turro, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. lazzeri.maximus@gmail.com

Articles citing this

Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new? Curr Opin Oncol (2014) 1.16

Correlation and diagnostic performance of the prostate-specific antigen level with the diagnosis, aggressiveness, and bone metastasis of prostate cancer in clinical practice. Prostate Int (2014) 1.09

The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements. Biomark Cancer (2016) 0.92

Diagnostic ability of %p2PSA and prostate health index for aggressive prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep (2014) 0.91

Next-generation prostate-specific antigen test: precursor form of prostate-specific antigen. Int J Clin Oncol (2014) 0.91

The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol (2014) 0.89

PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers. Cell Oncol (Dordr) (2016) 0.86

Clinical use of [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives (%p2PSA and Prostate Health Index) for the detection of prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Korean J Urol (2014) 0.84

The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used? World J Urol (2014) 0.83

Improvement of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis by Detecting PSA Glycosylation-Specific Changes. Theranostics (2016) 0.82

Recent progress and perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers. Int J Clin Oncol (2016) 0.81

Current early diagnostic biomarkers of prostate cancer. Asian J Androl (2014) 0.81

Significance of preoperative butyrylcholinesterase as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol (2015) 0.80

Targeted proteomics in urinary extracellular vesicles identifies biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Oncotarget (2016) 0.79

Potential Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Biomed Res Int (2015) 0.76

Early Prediction of Therapy Response to Abiraterone Acetate Using PSA Subforms in Patients with Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 0.75

Predictive value of [-2]propsa (p2psa) and its derivatives for the prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0ng/mL PSA range. Int Braz J Urol (2017) 0.75

Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective. Indian J Surg Oncol (2017) 0.75

Prostate cancer: Prostate Health Index--improving screening in men with family history. Nat Rev Urol (2013) 0.75

Kallikrein-Related Peptidases in Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Function to Clinical Application. EJIFCC (2014) 0.75

Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men. Asian J Androl (2016) 0.75

The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men. Curr Opin Urol (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol (2009) 4.58

A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2007) 4.37

Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2009) 3.93

Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol (2008) 3.83

Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2008) 3.64

Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2008) 3.50

Molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and identification of new drug targets. Cancer Discov (2011) 3.43

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2012) 3.26

Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol (2009) 3.18

Beta-arrestin-mediated beta1-adrenergic receptor transactivation of the EGFR confers cardioprotection. J Clin Invest (2007) 3.15

Integrative genomic analyses reveal an androgen-driven somatic alteration landscape in early-onset prostate cancer. Cancer Cell (2013) 3.08

The rate of secondary malignancies after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a population-based study on 17,845 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 3.06

Circulating miRNAs are correlated with tumor progression in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer (2011) 3.02

Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol (2007) 2.92

Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol (2012) 2.84

Extensive biopsies and transurethral prostate resection in men with previous negative biopsies and high or increasing prostate specific antigen. J Urol (2009) 2.77

Perioperative mortality is significantly greater in septuagenarian and octogenarian patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urology (2011) 2.76

Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol (2009) 2.76

Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2012) 2.74

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly improves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting. Eur Urol (2011) 2.74

Role for interleukin-6 in COPD-related pulmonary hypertension. Chest (2009) 2.73

Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors. J Urol (2003) 2.72

Prevalence of a tertiary Gleason grade and its impact on adverse histopathologic parameters in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series. Eur Urol (2008) 2.72

Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial. Eur Urol (2007) 2.71

Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2011) 2.62

International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol (2002) 2.51

Validation of the contemporary epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men. Eur Urol (2007) 2.50

Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol (2006) 2.48

Clinical utility of the PCA3 urine assay in European men scheduled for repeat biopsy. Eur Urol (2008) 2.48

Head-to-head comparison of prostate health index and urinary PCA3 for predicting cancer at initial or repeat biopsy. J Urol (2013) 2.48

A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2009) 2.47

Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas. J Urol (2008) 2.45

Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol (2009) 2.45

Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with small renal masses: a retrospective observational analysis. Eur Urol (2012) 2.45

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2012) 2.43

Marked gene transcript level alterations occur early during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 2.41

Contemporary management of the painful bladder: a systematic review. Eur Urol (2011) 2.39

Age-adjusted incidence, mortality, and survival rates of stage-specific renal cell carcinoma in North America: a trend analysis. Eur Urol (2010) 2.38

Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol (2008) 2.37

Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2008) 2.31

Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases. Eur Urol (2007) 2.30

Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol (2013) 2.26

Frozen section for the management of intraoperatively detected palpable tumor lesions during nerve-sparing scheduled radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2006) 2.21

Propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a national series. Eur Urol (2011) 2.20

Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique? J Urol (2005) 2.19

Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 2.16

Oncologic results of laparoscopic renal cryoablation for clinical T1a tumors: 8 years of experience in a single institution. Urology (2010) 2.15

Renal cell carcinoma with nodal metastases in the absence of distant metastatic disease: prognostic indicators of disease-specific survival. Eur Urol (2006) 2.15

Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology (2012) 2.13

A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol (2011) 2.11

Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol (2011) 2.06

Comparative study of inguinal hernia repair after radical prostatectomy, prostate biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate or pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol (2010) 2.05

SLC45A3-ELK4 is a novel and frequent erythroblast transformation-specific fusion transcript in prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2009) 2.03

Higher perioperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nephrectomy for non-metastatic kidney cancer: a population-based analysis. BJU Int (2012) 2.03

Blood transfusions in radical prostatectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. Urology (2012) 2.03

High provider volume is associated with lower rate of secondary therapies after definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2007) 2.02

Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2008) 2.02

Methods and priorities of robotic surgery training program. Eur Urol (2013) 2.00

Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol (2011) 2.00

Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol (2005) 1.97

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol (2006) 1.96

A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol (2003) 1.96

Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for early continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled study. Eur Urol (2010) 1.95

Botulinum A toxin intravesical injections in the treatment of painful bladder syndrome: a pilot study. Eur Urol (2006) 1.93

Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol (2011) 1.91

Segmental ureterectomy can safely be performed in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter. J Urol (2010) 1.91

Acceptance of and discontinuation rate from erectile dysfunction oral treatment in patients following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 1.90