Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?

PubWeight™: 0.84‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4078269)

Published in J Am Med Inform Assoc on October 21, 2013

Authors

Pashiera Barkhuysen1, Wim de Grauw1, Reinier Akkermans2, José Donkers1, Henk Schers1, Marion Biermans1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2: Department of Primary and Community Care/Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Articles cited by this

Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol (1993) 10.63

Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med (2006) 8.19

The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol (2003) 7.54

Integrated care pathways. BMJ (1998) 6.14

Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ (2003) 3.83

Effects of purchaser competition in the Dutch health system: is the glass half full or half empty? Health Econ Policy Law (2011) 3.25

The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988. Arch Pathol Lab Med (1997) 3.06

A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med (2003) 3.06

The association between diabetes metabolic control and drug adherence in an indigent population. Diabetes Care (2002) 2.83

Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Epidemiol (2000) 2.56

The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health (1999) 2.52

Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands. N Engl J Med (2011) 2.41

Biomarkers and surrogate markers: an FDA perspective. NeuroRx (2004) 2.20

Clinical inertia contributes to poor diabetes control in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ (2005) 1.89

Quality of recording of data from patients with type 2 diabetes is not a valid indicator of quality of care. A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract (2003) 1.88

The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. Prev Med (2003) 1.87

An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system. J Health Polit Policy Law (2008) 1.83

Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures. Med Care (2009) 1.79

Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress. Am J Manag Care (2005) 1.76

Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. Health Serv Res (2003) 1.65

Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States? Health Aff (Millwood) (2008) 1.62

Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care. Health Serv Res (2005) 1.56

Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Adv Data (2007) 1.55

Outcomes of audit-enhanced monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes. J Fam Pract (2002) 1.32

Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr (2002) 1.23

Towards integrated care for chronic conditions: Dutch policy developments to overcome the (financial) barriers. Health Policy (2010) 1.19

Routinely collected general practice data: goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Inform Prim Care (2006) 1.14

Is there a business case for quality in The Netherlands? A critical analysis of the recent reforms of the health care system. Health Policy (2006) 1.10

Review: relation between quality-of-care indicators for diabetes and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Med Care Res Rev (2011) 1.10

Brief report: The prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. A national survey. J Gen Intern Med (2005) 1.07

Cost assessment and price setting of inpatient care in The Netherlands. the DBC case-mix system. Health Care Manag Sci (2006) 1.06

The practice of markets in Dutch health care: are we drinking from the same glass? Health Econ Policy Law (2011) 1.03

What part of the total care consumed by type 2 diabetes patients is directly related to diabetes? Implications for disease management programs. Int J Integr Care (2011) 0.93

A structured registration program can be validly used for quality assessment in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 0.87

Conditional relative odds ratio and comparison of accuracy of diagnostic tests based on 2 x 2 tables. J Epidemiol (2006) 0.81

Structured primary care for type 2 diabetes has positive effects on clinical outcomes. J Eval Clin Pract (2010) 0.79