Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.

PubWeight™: 1.08‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMC 4078279)

Published in J Am Med Inform Assoc on December 03, 2013

Authors

Katherine K Kim1, Dennis K Browe2, Holly C Logan2, Roberta Holm3, Lori Hack3, Lucila Ohno-Machado4

Author Affiliations

1: San Francisco State University, Health Equity Institute, San Francisco, California, USA Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, San Francisco, California, USA.
2: San Francisco State University, Health Equity Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
3: Object Health, LLC, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
4: Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Articles cited by this

Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ (2000) 16.24

Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care (2010) 3.29

Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med (2009) 3.15

Biomedical informatics research network: building a national collaboratory to hasten the derivation of new understanding and treatment of disease. Stud Health Technol Inform (2005) 3.14

Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res (1991) 2.65

iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 2.51

Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 2.09

Meeting the governance challenges of next-generation biorepository research. Sci Transl Med (2010) 1.75

SHARE: system design and case studies for statistical health information release. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 1.72

Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. J Adv Nurs (1998) 1.66

Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 1.61

Never too old for anonymity: a statistical standard for demographic data sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2010) 1.57

Consumer experience with and attitudes toward health information technology: a nationwide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 1.39

Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2009) 1.37

Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. Int J Med Inform (2003) 1.18

Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 1.18

Privacy technology to support data sharing for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. Med Care (2013) 1.07

To share or not to share: that is not the question. Sci Transl Med (2012) 1.06

Privacy by Design at Population Data BC: a case study describing the technical, administrative, and physical controls for privacy-sensitive secondary use of personal information for research in the public interest. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 1.03

Toward practicing privacy. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2013) 0.97

Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2013) 0.96

Development of a privacy and security policy framework for a multistate comparative effectiveness research network. Med Care (2013) 0.93

Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2012) 0.91

Development of a HIPAA-compliant environment for translational research data and analytics. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2013) 0.85