Defining the flow-limiting stenosis noninvasively for management of patients with coronary artery disease.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3992471)

Published in JACC Cardiovasc Interv on December 11, 2013

Authors

Tiago A Magalhães1, João A C Lima2

Author Affiliations

1: Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
2: Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: jlima@jhmi.edu.

Articles citing this

Noninvasive physiologic assessment of coronary stenoses using cardiac CT. Biomed Res Int (2015) 0.79

Articles cited by this

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med (2009) 13.42

Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med (2012) 8.39

Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA (2012) 6.96

Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med (2011) 1.87

Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging (2012) 1.85

Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology (2011) 1.49

Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia. J Nucl Med (1996) 1.47

Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr (2012) 1.29

A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 1.13

Results from coronary angioplasty and implications for the future. Am Heart J (1982) 0.96

Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J (2012) 0.95

Contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging in the detection of reduced coronary flow velocity reserve. Radiology (2007) 0.87