Breaking the addiction to technology adoption.

PubWeight™: 0.82‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 24590701)

Published in Health Econ on April 01, 2014

Authors

Stirling Bryan1, Craig Mitton, Cam Donaldson

Author Affiliations

1: School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Canada; Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK.

Articles by these authors

A randomized trial of a single dose of oral dexamethasone for mild croup. N Engl J Med (2004) 5.02

Epinephrine and dexamethasone in children with bronchiolitis. N Engl J Med (2009) 4.35

Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis (2002) 3.06

Centralized drug review processes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood) (2006) 2.87

An economic evaluation of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med (2002) 2.69

Cost-effectiveness of epinephrine and dexamethasone in children with bronchiolitis. Pediatrics (2010) 2.68

Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2004) 2.59

The Common Drug Review: a NICE start for Canada? Health Policy (2005) 2.58

Can tissue transglutaminase antibody titers replace small-bowel biopsy to diagnose celiac disease in select pediatric populations? Pediatrics (2005) 2.16

Cost of acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit: clinical and resource implications of renal recovery. Crit Care Med (2003) 2.13

Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Health Policy (2003) 1.91

Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers. Health Policy (2002) 1.83

Cost effectiveness analysis in health care: contraindications. BMJ (2002) 1.80

Special care facility compared with traditional environments for dementia care: a longitudinal study of quality of life. J Am Geriatr Soc (2004) 1.71

Economics and obesity: costing the problem or evaluating solutions? Obes Res (2004) 1.63

Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers. BMJ (2005) 1.52

Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting? J Health Serv Res Policy (2006) 1.52

Rapid evaluation after high-risk TIA is associated with lower stroke risk. Can J Neurol Sci (2009) 1.45

Priority setting in Ontario's LHINs: ethics and economics in action. Healthc Q (2011) 1.45

A feasibility study of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for bladder and bowel dysfunction in elderly adults in residential care. J Am Med Dir Assoc (2012) 1.45

Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE. Health Econ Policy Law (2011) 1.42

Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities. BMJ (2006) 1.33

Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ (2011) 1.24

Priority setting in a Canadian surgical department: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis. Can J Surg (2003) 1.24

Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programmes: where's the 'extra' in extra-welfarism? Soc Sci Med (2003) 1.24

Managing to manage healthcare resources in the English NHS? What can health economics teach? What can health economics learn? Health Policy (2007) 1.22

Economic evaluation of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring) (2006) 1.20

The health-care system: an assessment and reform agenda. Lancet (2009) 1.19

Using PBMA in health care priority setting: description, challenges and experience. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2003) 1.19

Detailed cost analysis of care for survivors of severe sepsis. Crit Care Med (2004) 1.19

Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity. Soc Sci Med (2003) 1.17

Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.15

International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US. Pharmacoeconomics (2010) 1.15

The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches. Health Econ (2009) 1.14

Clinical and economic evaluation of rapid influenza a virus testing in nursing homes in calgary, Canada. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 1.10

Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application. Soc Sci Med (2012) 1.10

History and measurement of continuity of care in mental health services and evidence of its role in outcomes. Psychiatr Serv (2003) 1.09

Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods. J Health Econ (2004) 1.09

An economic evaluation of operative compared with nonoperative management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 1.07

What needs to be done in contingent valuation: have Smith and Sach missed the boat? Health Econ Policy Law (2010) 1.07

Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.07

A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of disseminating practice guidelines for children with croup [ISRCTN73394937]. Implement Sci (2006) 1.06

Systematic review of stroke thrombolysis service configuration. Expert Rev Neurother (2009) 1.05

Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2013) 1.01

Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy (2009) 1.00

Costs of rheumatoid arthritis: new estimates from the human capital method and comparison to the willingness-to-pay method. Med Decis Making (2007) 1.00

Willingness to pay for public health care: a comparison of two approaches. Health Policy (2004) 0.99

Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: an application of the discrete choice experiment. Obes Res (2004) 0.98

Dialysis adequacy and health related quality of life in hemodialysis patients. ASAIO J (2002) 0.97

Choosing the method to match the perspective: economic assessment and its implications for health-services efficiency. Lancet (2002) 0.95

Willingness to pay for a QALY: past, present and future. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2008) 0.95

Illustrating the impact of including future costs in economic evaluations: an application to end-stage renal disease care. Health Econ (2003) 0.95

Social enterprise: new pathways to health and well-being? J Public Health Policy (2012) 0.95

Frequency and adequacy of depression treatment in a Canadian population sample. Can J Psychiatry (2007) 0.94

Should we use willingness to pay to elicit community preferences for health care? New evidence from using a 'marginal' approach. J Health Econ (2002) 0.93

Introducing priority setting and resource allocation in home and community care programs. J Health Serv Res Policy (2008) 0.93

Using participatory action research to build a priority setting process in a Canadian Regional Health Authority. Soc Sci Med (2006) 0.92

Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach. Soc Sci Med (2013) 0.91

Paying for treatments? Influences on negotiating clinical need and decision-making for dental implant treatment. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 0.90

Evaluation of the impact of program budgeting and marginal analysis in Vancouver Island Health Authority. J Health Serv Res Policy (2009) 0.90

System tools for system change. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 0.90

Modelling the monetary value of a QALY: a new approach based on UK data. Health Econ (2009) 0.89

Commissioning NHS dentistry in England: issues for decision-makers managing the new contract with finite resources. Health Policy (2008) 0.88

The new myth: the social value of the QALY. Pharmacoeconomics (2008) 0.88

Catastrophic healthcare payments and impoverishment in the occupied Palestinian territory. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2010) 0.87

Decision maker views on priority setting in the Vancouver Island Health Authority. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2008) 0.87

Using evaluation theory in priority setting and resource allocation. J Health Organ Manag (2012) 0.87

Case study on priority setting in rural Southern Alberta: keeping the house from blowing in. Can J Rural Med (2004) 0.86

Centralising drug review to improve coverage decisions: economic lessons from (and for) Canada. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2006) 0.86

Knowledge translation in the discourse of professional practice. Int J Evid Based Healthc (2011) 0.85

Implementing world class commissioning competencies. J Health Serv Res Policy (2012) 0.85

Drug formulary decision-making in two regional health authorities in British Columbia, Canada. Health Policy (2008) 0.84

The evolution of PBMA: towards a macro-level priority setting framework for health regions. Health Care Manag Sci (2003) 0.82

Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care? J Health Econ (2002) 0.82

Implicit versus explicit ranking: on inferring ordinal preferences for health care programmes based on differences in willingness-to-pay. J Health Econ (2005) 0.82

To reuse or not to reuse? An economic evaluation of hemodialyzer reuse versus conventional single-use hemodialysis for chronic hemodialysis patients. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2002) 0.82

Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2010) 0.82

Listening to the decision makers: sustainability of PBMA in Alberta. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2004) 0.82

A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications. J Health Econ (2004) 0.82

Cost-effectiveness of health-related lifestyle advice delivered by peer or lay advisors: synthesis of evidence from a systematic review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2013) 0.81

Resource allocation in health care: health economics and beyond. Health Care Anal (2003) 0.81

Valuing food safety improvements using willingness to pay. Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2003) 0.81

Comparing WTP values of different types of QALY gain elicited from the general public. Health Econ (2013) 0.81

Q-ing for health--a new approach to eliciting the public's views on health care resource allocation. Health Econ (2013) 0.80

Physician involvement in setting priorities for health regions. Healthc Manage Forum (2004) 0.80

Decision maker perceptions of resource allocation processes in Canadian health care organizations: a national survey. BMC Health Serv Res (2013) 0.80

Use of the U.S. and U.K. scoring algorithm for the EuroQol-5D in an economic evaluation of cardiac care. Med Care (2007) 0.80

Priority-setting in health authorities: moving beyond the barriers. The Calgary experience. Healthc Q (2005) 0.80

The costs and benefits of community thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction : a decision-analytic model. Pharmacoeconomics (2004) 0.80

Resource allocation in orthopaedics: economic evaluation to priority setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 0.80