Published in Clin Orthop Relat Res on April 04, 2014
Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 1.31
Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 1.21
Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients. Adv Orthop (2015) 0.77
Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2016) 0.77
The Role of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing: Review Article. HSS J (2016) 0.75
Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2016) 0.75
Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects. EFORT Open Rev (2017) 0.75
Medium term review of the ASR implant system: A single surgeon series. J Orthop (2017) 0.75
CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.75
Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management. Adv Ther (2016) 0.75
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med (2009) 65.36
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 24.18
The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club (1995) 8.57
A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) Am J Epidemiol (1990) 4.84
Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: the results at five years from a regional hip register. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1999) 3.20
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 3.13
Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 3.05
Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2009) 2.61
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2006) 2.31
Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 2.28
Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis (2003) 2.20
The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 2.11
Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 2.08
Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 1.88
Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.82
A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2003) 1.82
Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000) 1.71
Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1997) 1.63
Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 1.63
Three- to six-year results with the Ultima metal-on-metal hip articulation for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.61
Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.60
Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.57
Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 1.50
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 1.45
Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2007) 1.38
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int (2006) 1.36
Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.32
A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.28
Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.27
Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement : a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.25
Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2001) 1.20
What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.18
Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.17
A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis (2009) 1.17
Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.15
Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.15
The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2012) 1.14
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty (1999) 1.12
Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component. Excellent results at ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1997) 1.12
Intraoperative fractures of the acetabulum during primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2006) 1.10
Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (2009) 1.09
Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymüller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 1.09
An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.09
The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Orthop (2010) 1.09
Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.08
Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.07
Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1999) 1.04
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome. Eur J Med Res (2008) 1.04
Seven to 10 years followup of an anatomic hip prosthesis: an international study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.03
Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study. Int Orthop (2009) 1.02
Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 1.01
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010) 1.01
The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital. Int Orthop (2009) 0.99
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. Seven-to-ten-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1997) 0.99
Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 0.99
Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1997) 0.98
Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2010) 0.97
The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 0.97
A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50-70 years old: comparison of university hospital data and registry data. Acta Orthop (2008) 0.96
Ten-year survivorship of the Anatomique Benoist Girard I total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2007) 0.96
Fifteen-year clinical survivorship of Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.96
A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3-6 years follow-up. Hip Int (2010) 0.95
Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 0.95
The results of a proximally-coated cementless femoral component in total hip replacement: a five- to 12-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2008) 0.95
Long-term results of a contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.95
Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2011) 0.95
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with insertion of an anatomically designed femoral component without cement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. A study with a minimum of six years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1999) 0.94
Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases. Int Orthop (2007) 0.94
Patient relevant outcomes after total hip replacement. A comparison between different surgical techniques. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2003) 0.93
Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 0.93
Clinical and radiographic results of cementless AML total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty (2001) 0.93
The Birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis: an independent single surgeon's experience at 7-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.93
A systematic review of modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty in active young patients. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.92
No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups. J Orthop Traumatol (2010) 0.92
Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am (2005) 0.91
Cobalt and chromium levels in blood and urine following hip resurfacing arthroplasty with the Conserve Plus implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 0.91
Long-term results of metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics (2010) 0.91
The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.90
The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg (2006) 0.90
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 0.90
Early clinical experience with the use of the Birmingham hip resurfacing system. Orthopedics (2008) 0.90
THA with the ABG I prosthesis at 15 years. Excellent survival with minimal osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 0.90
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 0.90
Outcome and serum ion determination up to 11 years after implantation of a cemented metal-on-metal hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop (2009) 0.89
Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis (2009) 0.89
Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.89
Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component in patients younger than 50 years. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.89
Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop (2005) 0.88
Is the Charnley evolution working? A five-year outcome study. Acta Orthop Belg (2004) 0.88
Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: a five- to ten-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty (1998) 0.87
The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis (2009) 0.87
Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Int Orthop (1999) 0.87
Large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using the Durom acetabular component at minimum 1-year interval. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.86
Changes in proximal femoral bone mineral density around a hydroxyapatite-coated hip joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) (2003) 0.86
Changes in whole blood metal ion levels following resurfacing: serial measurements in a multi-centre study. Hip Int (2009) 0.86
100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 0.85
Hip resurfacing and osteonecrosis: results from an independent hip resurfacing register. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2010) 0.85
Introduction of total hip arthroplasty in Lithuania: results from the first 10 years. Acta Orthop (2007) 0.85
Zweymueller with metal-on-metal articulation: clinical, radiological and histological analysis of short-term results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2002) 0.85
Matched-pair analysis of cemented and cementless acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2001) 0.85
The AMP-activated protein kinase AAK-2 links energy levels and insulin-like signals to lifespan in C. elegans. Genes Dev (2004) 4.84
Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res (2004) 2.47
Aging networks in Caenorhabditis elegans: AMP-activated protein kinase (aak-2) links multiple aging and metabolism pathways. Aging Cell (2006) 2.06
A systematic literature review of the evidence on benchmarks for cataract surgery waiting time. Can J Ophthalmol (2007) 1.94
The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 1.94
NSAID use and progression of chronic kidney disease. Am J Med (2007) 1.75
The Western Canada Waiting List Project: development of a priority referral score for hip and knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract (2007) 1.39
A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women. BMC Public Health (2012) 1.38
Health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: current practices. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2012) 1.18
The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.13
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.12
Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: concepts and scoping of the published literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2008) 1.11
Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 1: Infection resolution. Can J Surg (2007) 1.07
Public health preparedness: a systems-level approach. J Epidemiol Community Health (2007) 1.06
Health technology reassessment: scope, methodology, & language. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2012) 1.05
Telehealth outcomes: a synthesis of the literature and recommendations for outcome indicators. J Telemed Telecare (2007) 1.02
A health technology assessment of transient elastography in adult liver disease. Can J Gastroenterol (2013) 1.00
Prioritization of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee replacement: validation of a priority criteria tool. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2004) 0.97
Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty. CMAJ (2008) 0.96
Out of context? Translating evidence from the North Karelia project over place and time. Health Educ Res (2006) 0.95
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for blunt cerebrovascular injury detection in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg (2013) 0.95
Health technology reassessment: the art of the possible. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2013) 0.94
Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2011) 0.93
Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res (2014) 0.93
Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 2: Health-related quality of life and function with the PROSTALAC implant in situ. Can J Surg (2007) 0.92
Improving the management of waiting lists for elective healthcare services: public perspectives on proposed solutions. Hosp Q (2002) 0.92
Validation of a prediction model to estimate health utilities index Mark 3 utility scores from WOMAC index scores in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Value Health (2008) 0.92
Radiofrequency ablation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain Res Manag (2014) 0.92
Relative urgency for referral from primary care to rheumatologists: the Priority Referral Score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) (2011) 0.91
The efficacy of pharmacotherapy for decreasing the expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (2008) 0.91
Determinants of patient and surgeon perspectives on maximum acceptable waiting times for hip and knee arthroplasty. J Health Serv Res Policy (2005) 0.91
Modelling the behaviour of ligaments: a technical note. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin (2004) 0.91
Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis. Value Health (2013) 0.88
Measuring the value of total hip and knee arthroplasty: considering costs over the continuum of care. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 0.88
The possibilities and the realities of home care. Can J Public Health (2005) 0.87
Acute botulinum toxin-induced muscle weakness in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient rabbit. J Orthop Res (2005) 0.87
2004 MacLean-Mueller prize enteral or parenteral nutrition for severe pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial and health technology assessment. Can J Surg (2005) 0.86
A study of the effectiveness of performance-focused methodology for improved outcomes in Alberta public healthcare. Healthc Manage Forum (2010) 0.85
Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times. Implement Sci (2013) 0.85
Estimating osteoarthritis incidence from population-based administrative health care databases. Ann Epidemiol (2006) 0.84
Home care evolution in alberta: how have palliative clients fared? Healthc Policy (2007) 0.83
A safe overhang limit for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties based on medial collateral ligament strains: an in vitro study. J Arthroplasty (2012) 0.83
Risk assessment for inherited susceptibility to cancer: a review of the psychosocial and ethical dimensions. Genet Test (2005) 0.83
Experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing in women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 0.81
Proposed model of botulinum toxin-induced muscle weakness in the rabbit. J Orthop Res (2005) 0.81
A systematic review of value-based insurance design in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care (2014) 0.81
The Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute: creating sustainable accountability through collaboration, relevant measurement and timely feedback. Healthc Pap (2006) 0.80
Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract (2013) 0.80
Performance management tools motivate change at the frontlines. Healthc Manage Forum (2014) 0.79
Perspectives on neurological patient registries: a literature review and focus group study. BMC Med Res Methodol (2013) 0.78
'There are too many of us to fix.' Patients' views of acceptable waiting times for hip and knee replacement. J Health Serv Res Policy (2009) 0.78
Voluntary versus involuntary waiting for joint replacements: new Alberta wait times rules for hip and knee arthroplasties, with provincial consensus. Healthc Q (2012) 0.77
You'll know when you're ready: a qualitative study exploring how patients decide when the time is right for joint replacement surgery. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.77
Public health preparedness in Alberta: a systems-level study. BMC Public Health (2006) 0.76
Patient factors in referral choice for total joint replacement surgery. Med Care (2014) 0.76
Systematic review of risk adjustment models of hospital length of stay (LOS). Med Care (2015) 0.76
The use of magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injuries can be reduced by non-physician expert clinics. Phys Sportsmed (2015) 0.76
Mentoring adolescents to prevent drug and alcohol use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 0.76
Bilateral femoral insufficiency fractures likely related to long-term alendronate therapy. J Osteoporos (2011) 0.75
Daily physical activity after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: a pilot study. Eur Respir J (2012) 0.75
A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures. Can J Surg (2007) 0.75
An economic evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta Can J Surg (2017) 0.75
Nine questions for the for-profit delivery of healthcare in Canada. Healthc Manage Forum (2003) 0.75
543: IMPACT OF ETHICS CONSULTATION IN ADULT INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Crit Care Med (2016) 0.75
Patient choice systems and waiting times for scheduled services. Healthc Manage Forum (2011) 0.75
Kinematic differences between gender specific and traditional knee implants. J Arthroplasty (2013) 0.75
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: prescription or technologic placebo. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can (1992) 0.75
Sustainability: orthopaedic surgery wait time management strategies. Int J Health Care Qual Assur (2015) 0.75
Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Tarlov Cysts: A Systematic Review of Published Literature. Clin Spine Surg (2017) 0.75