There and back again: putting the vectorial movement planning hypothesis to a critical test.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3994639)

Published in PeerJ on April 15, 2014

Authors

Eva-Maria Kobak1, Simone Cardoso de Oliveira2

Author Affiliations

1: Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg , Germany ; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London , United Kingdom.
2: Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg , Germany ; BrainLinks-BrainTools, Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg , Germany.

Articles cited by this

The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia (1971) 86.03

Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature (2002) 13.46

Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science (2002) 10.35

Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature (1998) 9.13

Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science (1986) 8.79

Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature (2012) 7.87

Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci (2000) 4.45

Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol (1999) 4.39

Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci (2003) 2.52

Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res (1994) 2.42

Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. Adv Exp Med Biol (2009) 2.19

How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res (1996) 1.79

Direct cortical representation of drawing. Science (1994) 1.73

Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J Neurophysiol (2007) 1.66

Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res (1999) 1.55

Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability. J Neurosci (2008) 1.47

Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol Rev (1995) 1.35

Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1995) 1.31

Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci (2005) 1.26

Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophysiol (2007) 1.21

Motor memory is encoded as a gain-field combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations. J Neurosci (2012) 1.18

Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. J Neurophysiol (2003) 1.16

Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position. J Neurophysiol (1998) 1.10

Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. Science (1978) 0.99

Dominance of vision over proprioception on motor programming: evidence from ERP. Cereb Cortex (2009) 0.97

Tuning curves for movement direction in the human visuomotor system. J Neurosci (2010) 0.97

The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping. J Neurosci (2013) 0.95

An online brain-machine interface using decoding of movement direction from the human electrocorticogram. J Neural Eng (2012) 0.95

EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time. J Neurophysiol (2004) 0.86

Remembered positions: stored locations or stored postures? Exp Brain Res (1999) 0.86

Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers. J Neurophysiol (2011) 0.85

Neural coding of movement direction in the healthy human brain. PLoS One (2010) 0.84

Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations. Exp Brain Res (2012) 0.84

Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task. Exp Brain Res (2009) 0.77

Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets. Exp Brain Res (2011) 0.76