Published in Front Oncol on May 06, 2014
Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast (2016) 0.87
Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 0.76
Oncologic Safety of Local Excision Compared With Total Mesorectal Excision for ypT0-T1 Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) (2016) 0.75
Total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Electron Physician (2015) 0.75
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med (2004) 19.45
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2005) 14.64
Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet (2002) 14.34
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol (2005) 8.98
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg (1982) 8.69
Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet (1986) 8.16
Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc (1991) 7.12
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol (2008) 6.45
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2010) 5.51
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2013) 5.42
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg (2007) 5.30
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2005) 3.95
Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg (2010) 3.63
Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg (2012) 2.93
Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg (2008) 2.50
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol (2009) 2.32
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum (2011) 2.28
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc (2010) 2.18
Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc (2008) 1.79
A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 1.67
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 1.59
Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg (2008) 1.57
Is the port site really at risk? Biology, mechanisms and prevention: a critical view. Aust N Z J Surg (1999) 1.55
Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis (2012) 1.53
An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis (2011) 1.44
The European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) survey of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int (2013) 1.42
Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS (2009) 1.39
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol (2010) 1.36
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 1.35
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends. Arch Surg (2012) 1.27
Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia. Am J Surg (1992) 1.26
S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc (2010) 1.25
Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc (2010) 1.22
Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc (2013) 1.20
Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy. J Clin Oncol (1996) 1.18
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg (2012) 1.17
Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol (2011) 1.16
Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum (2007) 1.14
Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J Am Coll Surg (2012) 1.11
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2005) 1.09
Laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on short-term outcome and survival. Ann Surg Oncol (2009) 1.04
Optimal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: the Role of Robotic Surgery from an Expert's View. J Korean Soc Coloproctol (2010) 1.02
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc (2012) 1.01
Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients. Int J Med Robot (2012) 0.98
Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations. Eur J Surg (2002) 0.92
Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg (2013) 0.87
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal rectal cancer surgery: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc (2011) 0.86
The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Ecancermedicalscience (2013) 0.85
Modern rectal cancer multidisciplinary treatment: the role of radiation and surgery. Ann Surg Oncol (2013) 0.81
Effect of proctoring on implementation and results of elective laparoscopic colon surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis (2011) 0.80
Role of laparoscopic techniques in colorectal cancer surgery. Oncology (Williston Park) (1995) 0.79
Minimal access surgery for rectal cancer: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 0.78
[Total laparoscopic mesorectal excision versus robot-assisted in the treatment of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis]. Cir Esp (2012) 0.78
Angiogenic cells, macroparticles and RNA transcripts in laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther (2010) 0.78
Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume. J Am Coll Surg (2013) 0.78
Laparoscopy for colon cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am (2001) 0.76