International comparisons of the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and the United States: The MINAP/NICOR, SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA, and ACTION Registry-GWTG/NCDR registries.

PubWeight™: 1.04‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMC 4112832)

Published in Int J Cardiol on May 09, 2014

Authors

R L McNamara1, S C Chung2, T Jernberg3, D Holmes4, M Roe4, A Timmis5, S James6, J Deanfield7, G C Fonarow8, E D Peterson4, A Jeppsson9, H Hemingway2

Author Affiliations

1: Yale University School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: robert.mcnamara@yale.edu.
2: Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research @ UCL Partners, University College London, London, UK.
3: Dept of Medicine (Huddinge), Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Dept of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
4: Duke Clinical Research Institution, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
5: National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Unit, Barts Health London, UK.
6: Dept. of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
7: University College London, London, UK.
8: Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
9: Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles citing this

Comparison of hospital variation in acute myocardial infarction care and outcome between Sweden and United Kingdom: population based cohort study using nationwide clinical registries. BMJ (2015) 2.73

Quality of medical care for persons with serious mental illness: A comprehensive review. Schizophr Res (2015) 0.89

Practice of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care in the Netherlands during four snapshot weeks with the National Cardiovascular Database Registry for Acute Coronary Syndrome. Neth Heart J (2017) 0.83

Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc (2015) 0.81

The year of transparency: measuring quality of cardiac care. Neth Heart J (2015) 0.81

Predictors of non-invasive therapy and 28-day-case fatality in elderly compared to younger patients with acute myocardial infarction: an observational study from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry. BMC Cardiovasc Disord (2016) 0.75

Improved treatment and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in Estonia: cross-sectional study from a high risk country. BMC Cardiovasc Disord (2015) 0.75

Use of theory to plan or evaluate guideline implementation among physicians: a scoping review. Implement Sci (2017) 0.75

Long-term outcomes in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis (2016) 0.75

Reducing time to angiography and hospital stay for patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: retrospective analysis of a paramedic-activated direct access pathway. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75

Prognostic factors of in-hospital mortality in all comers with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Asia (2016) 0.75

Geographic variation in the treatment of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction in the English National Health Service: a cohort study. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75

Articles cited by this

Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med (1992) 18.74

Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med (2001) 9.31

Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet (2002) 8.10

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J (2007) 6.51

Variations between countries in invasive cardiac procedures and outcomes in patients with suspected unstable angina or myocardial infarction without initial ST elevation. OASIS (Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischaemic Syndromes) Registry Investigators. Lancet (1998) 5.46

Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet (1999) 4.33

Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study. BMJ (2013) 4.27

Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol (2010) 2.86

The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Heart (2010) 2.80

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol (2012) 2.50

2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2007 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol (2011) 2.37

The Swedish Web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart (2010) 2.24

External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med (2007) 2.14

From guidelines to clinical practice: the impact of hospital and geographical characteristics on temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J (2003) 1.94

A comparison of recombinant hirudin with heparin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) IIb investigators. N Engl J Med (1996) 1.92

A call to ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous quality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2009) 1.86

The role of cardiac registries in evidence-based medicine. Eur Heart J (2010) 1.83

Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J (2008) 1.81

Improved clinical outcome after acute myocardial infarction in hospitals participating in a Swedish quality improvement initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2009) 1.67

Recent trends in the care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE initiative. Arch Intern Med (2006) 1.66

Relation between renal function, presentation, use of therapies and in-hospital complications in acute coronary syndrome: data from the SWEDEHEART register. J Intern Med (2009) 1.65

Early management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance. Heart (2010) 1.56

ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Emergency Physicians Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Hospital Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol (2008) 1.51

Outcomes with the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart (2007) 1.47

Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value. Health Aff (Millwood) (2011) 1.39

Hospital-level performance improvement: beta-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction. Med Care (2004) 1.10

Are data from clinical registries of any value? Eur Heart J (2000) 1.10

Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J (2004) 0.99

Influence of age on use of cardiac catheterization and associated outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol (2009) 0.98

Hospital therapy traditions influence long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J (2005) 0.92

Cardiovascular registry research comes of age. Heart (2010) 0.86

The 2011 outcome from the Swedish Health Care Registry on Heart Disease (SWEDEHEART). Scand Cardiovasc J (2013) 0.86