Neighborhood effects in a behavioral randomized controlled trial.

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 25456014)

Published in Health Place on November 21, 2014

Authors

Sandi L Pruitt1, Tammy Leonard2, James Murdoch3, Amy Hughes4, Amy McQueen5, Samir Gupta6

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9169, USA. Electronic address: Sandi.Pruitt@utsouthwestern.edu.
2: Economics Department, University of Dallas, 1845 E. Northgate Dr., Irving, TX 75026, United States.
3: School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas-Dallas, 800W. Campbell Rd, GR31, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
4: Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas-Dallas, 800W. Campbell Rd, GR31, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
5: Division of Health Behavior Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus, Box 8005, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
6: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr MC 111D, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

Articles cited by this

The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med (2007) 34.75

The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med (2004) 12.89

Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol (2001) 7.70

Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. J Health Econ (2008) 4.44

Residential environments and cardiovascular risk. J Urban Health (2003) 4.00

Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex world. Soc Sci Med (2004) 3.98

The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med (2004) 3.58

Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies. Sociol Methods Res (2011) 3.30

Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 2.96

Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: longitudinal analysis. BMJ (2008) 2.14

Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults, age 50 years and older. Prev Med (2003) 2.05

On causal inference in the presence of interference. Stat Methods Med Res (2010) 2.01

Effect of language on colorectal cancer screening among Latinos and non-Latinos. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2008) 1.39

Are there gender differences in colorectal cancer test use prevalence and correlates? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2006) 1.22

Estimating the effect of smoking cessation on weight gain: an instrumental variable approach. Health Serv Res (2006) 1.21

Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening. BMC Public Health (2008) 1.18

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and use of colonoscopy in an insured population--a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One (2012) 1.18

Neighborhood socioeconomic context and adult health. The mediating role of individual health behaviors and psychosocial factors. Ann N Y Acad Sci (1999) 1.15

Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis. Int J Health Geogr (2010) 1.15

A mapping between interactions and interference: implications for vaccine trials. Epidemiology (2012) 0.97

Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: a case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]. BMC Public Health (2005) 0.96

Multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer screening use in California. Am J Manag Care (2013) 0.95

Causal inference and the relevance of social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med (2004) 0.90

Physicians, clinics, and neighborhoods: multiple levels of influence on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2014) 0.84

Examining regional variation in the use of cancer screening in Germany. Soc Sci Med (2014) 0.83

Commentary: Understanding social network analysis. BMJ (2008) 0.77