Published in Ann Intern Med on December 09, 2014
Supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med (2015) 0.92
Supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med (2015) 0.91
Supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med (2015) 0.90
Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging. Radiology (2015) 0.80
How Can Advanced Imaging Be Used to Mitigate Potential Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis? Acad Radiol (2016) 0.79
The Divide Between Breast Density Notification Laws and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Legislating Practice. JAMA Intern Med (2015) 0.79
Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser (2016) 0.77
Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2015) 0.76
Synergy in combining findings from mammography and ultrasonography in detecting malignancy in women with higher density breasts and lesions over 2 cm in Albania. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) (2017) 0.75
Population-Based Precision Cancer Screening: A Symposium on Evidence, Epidemiology, and Next Steps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2016) 0.75
Cancer Models and Real-world Data: Better Together. J Natl Cancer Inst (2015) 0.75
Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density. Med Clin North Am (2017) 0.75
Supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med (2015) 0.75
MRI screening for breast cancer in women at high risk; is the Australian breast MRI screening access program addressing the needs of women at high risk of breast cancer? J Med Radiat Sci (2015) 0.75
Utility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancer. Indian J Radiol Imaging (2017) 0.75
Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and Abroad. Diagnostics (Basel) (2017) 0.75
Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening? Eur Radiol (2017) 0.75
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2005) 16.70
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med (2005) 14.47
Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 14.32
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2008) 10.92
Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 7.85
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (2003) 7.73
Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology (2002) 7.48
Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology (2012) 5.72
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 5.17
Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA (1996) 4.89
Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med (2008) 4.81
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.60
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Med Decis Making (2006) 3.50
Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 2.84
The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 2.27
Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology (2012) 2.20
Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 2.19
To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology (2012) 2.15
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med (2012) 1.99
Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer (2009) 1.89
Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. JAMA Intern Med (2014) 1.81
The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J (2012) 1.79
Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol (2009) 1.76
The impact of a breast cancer screening programme on quality-adjusted life-years. Int J Cancer (1991) 1.57
The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 1.52
Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 1.51
The MISCAN-Fadia continuous tumor growth model for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 1.47
Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2014) 1.27
A comparative review of CISNET breast models used to analyze U.S. breast cancer incidence and mortality trends. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 1.15
Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J (2012) 1.13
Modeling the impact of adjuvant therapy and screening mammography on U.S. breast cancer mortality between 1975 and 2000: introduction to the problem. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 1.11
Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts. Clin Imaging (2012) 1.09
Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states. J Am Coll Radiol (2013) 1.08
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 0.98
Breast density legislation fueling controversy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 0.95
The density conundrum: does legislation help or hurt? J Am Coll Radiol (2013) 0.84
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med (2009) 35.94
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med (2012) 16.91
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2005) 16.70
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA (2006) 12.22
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin (2007) 12.19
Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med (2014) 11.30
Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 11.27
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med (2008) 10.35
Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med (2009) 10.27
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med (2004) 8.91
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (2003) 7.73
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA (2006) 7.45
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med (2012) 7.21
Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med (2009) 6.79
Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med (2007) 6.72
Changes in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy after the publication of clinical trial results. Ann Intern Med (2004) 6.42
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 6.28
Unique lipoprotein phenotype and genotype associated with exceptional longevity. JAMA (2003) 6.17
Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer (2008) 5.62
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 5.17
Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med (2005) 5.11
Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 5.08
Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2006) 5.06
Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med (2008) 4.81
Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA (2012) 4.71
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.60
Screening for breast cancer. JAMA (2005) 4.56
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA (2003) 4.53
Design of the Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2002) 4.42
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.28
Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet (2003) 4.20
Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) (2008) 4.05
Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med (2006) 3.95
Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology (2003) 3.90
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 3.83
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 3.53
Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in the randomized NELSON trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 3.47
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2008) 3.46
Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer Cell (2007) 3.44
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology (2005) 3.40
Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology (2012) 3.36
Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 3.33
Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc (2002) 3.09
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 2.99
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88
Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer (2007) 2.85
Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology (2005) 2.85
Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.85
When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology (2009) 2.78
Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2013) 2.77
Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 2.75
Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings. N Engl J Med (2003) 2.72
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.72
Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 2.71
The prostate cancer conundrum revisited: treatment changes and prostate cancer mortality declines. Cancer (2012) 2.61
Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2005) 2.53
CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues. Cancer Discov (2012) 2.51
Chronic spinal pain and physical-mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Pain (2005) 2.50
Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol (2007) 2.49
Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.46
Screening for prostate cancer: results of the Rotterdam section of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2013) 2.43
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology (2005) 2.42
Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology (2002) 2.36
Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 2.35
Impact of reduced tobacco smoking on lung cancer mortality in the United States during 1975-2000. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 2.30
Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States. Obstet Gynecol (2004) 2.29
The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2006) 2.27
Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol Biol Cell (2005) 2.27
What if I don't treat my PSA-detected prostate cancer? Answers from three natural history models. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011) 2.25
"Sarcoid like" granulomatous pulmonary disease in World Trade Center disaster responders. Am J Ind Med (2010) 2.21
Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology (2012) 2.20
Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011) 2.18
A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 2.18
Geographic disparities in cervical cancer mortality: what are the roles of risk factor prevalence, screening, and use of recommended treatment? J Rural Health (2005) 2.08
Quality of osteoporosis care of older Medicare recipients with fragility fractures: 2006 to 2010. J Am Geriatr Soc (2013) 2.08
Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA (2004) 2.07
Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology (2010) 2.06
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology (2008) 2.06