Addressing implementation challenges during guideline development - a case study of Swedish national guidelines for methods of preventing disease.

PubWeight™: 0.81‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4308005)

Published in BMC Health Serv Res on January 22, 2015

Authors

Linda Richter-Sundberg1,2, Therese Kardakis3,4, Lars Weinehall5, Rickard Garvare6, Monica E Nyström7,8

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, SE 90185, Umeå, Sweden. linda.sundberg@epiph.umu.se.
2: Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. linda.sundberg@epiph.umu.se.
3: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, SE 90185, Umeå, Sweden. therese.kardakis@ki.se.
4: Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. therese.kardakis@ki.se.
5: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, SE 90185, Umeå, Sweden. lars.weinehall@epiph.umu.se.
6: Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, SE 971 87, Luleå, Sweden. rickard.garvare@ltu.se.
7: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, SE 90185, Umeå, Sweden. monica.nystrom@ki.se.
8: Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. monica.nystrom@ki.se.

Articles cited by this

Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ (1996) 66.70

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today (2004) 41.34

Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA (1999) 40.60

Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q (2004) 34.12

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess (2004) 29.45

Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health (2003) 13.59

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care (2003) 12.01

Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care (2001) 8.83

AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ (2010) 8.73

The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J (1979) 7.55

Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA (2001) 6.91

What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust (2004) 6.82

Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ (1999) 6.01

Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 5.28

Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care (1994) 5.05

Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ (2010) 3.80

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93

Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.52

The evolving role of prevention in health care: contributions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med (2001) 2.31

Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines' prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy (2007) 2.30

Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Qual Saf Health Care (2004) 2.28

The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care (2010) 2.26

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci (2011) 2.26

Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Jt Comm J Qual Improv (1995) 1.97

Has guideline development gone astray? Yes. BMJ (2010) 1.82

Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care (2010) 1.78

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.66

Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Soc Sci Med (2010) 1.66

Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci (2012) 1.59

Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches. Implement Sci (2008) 1.41

Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe. Health Policy (2012) 1.04

Implementing clinical practice guidelines about health promotion and disease prevention through shared decision making. J Gen Intern Med (2013) 1.03

Barriers, facilitators and attitudes influencing health promotion activities in general practice: an explorative pilot study. BMC Fam Pract (2013) 1.00

Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 0.99

A conceptual framework for public health: NICE's emerging approach. Public Health (2008) 0.99

Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to implement clinical guidelines for the management of chronic diseases at primary care level in EU Member States: a systematic review. Health Policy (2012) 0.97

[Successful strategies and methods of nursing standards implementation]. Pflege (2006) 0.96

The appraisal of public health interventions: an overview. J Public Health (Oxf) (2013) 0.85

The Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma approach to practice management guideline development using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg (2012) 0.79

Health promotion practice and its implementation in Swedish health care. Int Nurs Rev (2013) 0.79