Citation impact of NHLBI R01 grants funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as compared to R01 grants funded through a standard payline.

Maximizing the return on taxpayers' investments in fundamental biomedical research. Mol Biol Cell (2015) 0.97

Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circ Res (2015) 0.82

Initial Outcomes for the NHLBI K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Program in Relation to Long-Standing Career Development Programs: Implications for Trainees, Mentors, and Institutions. Circ Res (2016) 0.75

Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012. Eur Heart J (2016) 0.75

Biomedical research in an age of austerity. JAMA (2012) 2.52

Assessing value in biomedical research: the PQRST of appraisal and reward. JAMA (2014) 2.45

Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants. Circ Res (2014) 2.08

How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons. EMBO Rep (2012) 1.69

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: 1 year later. J Am Coll Cardiol (2010) 1.49

Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants. Circ Res (2014) 1.35

Use of hundreds of electrocardiographic biomarkers for prediction of mortality in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2011) 1.10

Is biomedical research a good investment? J Clin Invest (2014) 0.86