Clinical practice in febrile neutropenia risk assessment and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in Poland.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4355659)

Published in Contemp Oncol (Pozn) on December 31, 2014

Authors

Marek Wojtukiewicz1, Ewa Chmielowska2, Emilia Filipczyk-Cisarż3, Krzysztof Krzemieniecki4, Krzysztof Leśniewski-Kmak5, Maria M Litwiniuk6, Karolina Wieruszewska-Kowalczyk7, Elżbieta Kosno-Kruszewska7

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Oncology, Medical University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bialystok, Poland.
2: Oncology Clinic, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
3: Chemotherapy Department, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre, Wroclaw, Poland.
4: Oncology Department, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
5: Department of Propedeutical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk and Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Gdynia Oncology Centre, Gdynia, Poland.
6: Clinic of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
7: Amgen Biotechnologia Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland.

Articles cited by this

2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol (2006) 11.26

American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol (2012) 7.16

Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer (2006) 5.03

2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer (2010) 4.95

Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol (2009) 4.56

Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol (2007) 4.06

First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol (2005) 2.82

A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol (2003) 2.63

Achievement of optimal average relative dose intensity and correlation with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOP. Ann Hematol (2007) 2.05

Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol (2002) 1.67

Impact of chemotherapy dose intensity on cancer patient outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 1.63

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer (2011) 1.57

Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol (2010) 1.51

Predicting individual risk of neutropenic complications in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Cancer (2010) 1.34

Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2008) 1.25

Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (2000) 1.21

Risk factors for febrile neutropenia among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2013) 1.19

Are shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis associated with increased risk of hospitalization? Ann Pharmacother (2006) 1.15

Febrile neutropenia rates with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in early breast cancer: discrepancy between published reports and community practice-a retrospective analysis. Curr Oncol (2010) 1.09

Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma. A multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables. Cancer (1990) 1.08

The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol (2013) 1.06

Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) (2008) 1.02

Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis. Eur J Cancer (2008) 0.92

Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom. Value Health (2011) 0.88

Neutrophil recovery in elderly breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2009) 0.83

Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses. J Med Econ (2013) 0.83

Reporting of myelotoxicity associated with emerging regimens for the treatment of selected solid tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2011) 0.79