Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane - a cross-cultural comparison.

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4366652)

Published in Front Psychol on March 10, 2015

Authors

Silke M Göbel1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Psychology, University of York York, UK.

Articles cited by this

The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia (1971) 86.03

Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol (2008) 11.28

Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol (1990) 5.60

Animal cognition. Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line. Science (2015) 3.88

Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology (1980) 2.62

Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev (2009) 1.95

How to cook a SNARC: number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain Cogn (2009) 1.75

When digits help digits: spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Front Psychol (2011) 1.55

Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia (1998) 1.38

Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. J Exp Child Psychol (1999) 1.36

Reading space into numbers: a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition (2008) 1.34

Early development of spatial-numeric associations: evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Dev Sci (2010) 1.33

Is it only humans that count from left to right? Biol Lett (2010) 1.25

Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect. Mem Cognit (2004) 1.25

Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Percept Psychophys (2004) 1.23

Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia (2005) 1.23

What is the relationship between synaesthesia and visuo-spatial number forms? Cognition (2005) 1.23

On the language specificity of basic number processing: transcoding in a language with inversion and its relation to working memory capacity. J Exp Child Psychol (2008) 1.23

Images of numbers, or "When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue". Cognition (1992) 1.21

A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cogn Process (2012) 1.10

Whorf reloaded: language effects on nonverbal number processing in first grade--a trilingual study. J Exp Child Psychol (2010) 1.09

Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. J Exp Child Psychol (2008) 1.09

The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Exp Brain Res (2008) 1.08

Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. J Exp Child Psychol (2012) 1.08

Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) (2006) 1.05

Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiol Learn Mem (2010) 1.02

It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. Exp Psychol (2009) 1.01

The spatial-numerical congruity effect in preschoolers. J Exp Child Psychol (2011) 1.00

Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2012) 1.00

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) map number onto space. Cognition (2014) 0.99

Numbers in Space: Differences between Concrete and Abstract Situations. Front Psychol (2011) 0.95

Language affects symbolic arithmetic in children: the case of number word inversion. J Exp Child Psychol (2013) 0.94

Human infants' preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences. PLoS One (2014) 0.94

Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychol Sci (2008) 0.92

Reading habits and line bisection: a developmental approach. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res (1995) 0.90

The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychon Bull Rev (2006) 0.90

Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition (2007) 0.89

Spontaneous spatial mapping of learned sequence in chimpanzees: evidence for a SNARC-like effect. PLoS One (2014) 0.89

Orienting numbers in mental space: horizontal organization trumps vertical. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) (2012) 0.88

Minds without language represent number through space: origins of the mental number line. Front Psychol (2012) 0.87

The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up-down axis. Psychon Bull Rev (2012) 0.87

Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Mem Cognit (2007) 0.86

Lateralized mechanisms for encoding of object. Behavioral evidence from an animal model: the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Front Psychol (2014) 0.85

How space-number associations may be created in preliterate children: six distinct mechanisms. Front Psychol (2015) 0.85

Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds. J Exp Child Psychol (2013) 0.84

How to rapidly construct a spatial-numerical representation in preliterate children (at least temporarily). Dev Sci (2015) 0.83

Development of spatial preferences for counting and picture naming. Psychol Res (2014) 0.82

Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: an Interactive Account of attentional biases. Acta Psychol (Amst) (2014) 0.82

Relating numeric cognition and language processing: do numbers and words share a common representational platform? Acta Psychol (Amst) (2014) 0.82

Increasing magnitude counts more: asymmetrical processing of ordinality in 4-month-old infants. Cognition (2012) 0.81

There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2014) 0.79