An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 25853616)

Published in Int J Audiol on September 02, 2015

Authors

Virginia Best1,2, Gitte Keidser1, Jörg M Buchholz1,3, Katrina Freeston1

Author Affiliations

1: a National Acoustic Laboratories and the HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University , Australia.
2: b Department of Speech , Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University , Boston , USA.
3: c Audiology Section, Department of Linguistics , Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University , Australia.

Articles cited by this

The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys (2001) 11.40

Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am (1990) 4.24

Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am (2001) 3.63

The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol (2004) 3.45

Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am (2001) 2.66

Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J Am Acad Audiol (2006) 2.28

Aging and speech-on-speech masking. Ear Hear (2008) 1.87

Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.76

Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2006) 1.73

Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am (2002) 1.58

Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. J Acoust Soc Am (1969) 1.58

Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol (2001) 1.53

Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. J Am Acad Audiol (2004) 1.44

A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res (1986) 1.41

An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2007) 1.38

Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions. Int J Audiol (2008) 1.25

Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 1.19

Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.18

Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res (1993) 1.17

Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol (2010) 1.17

The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 1.16

Effect of age on directional microphone hearing aid benefit and preference. J Am Acad Audiol (2010) 1.15

Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test. J Am Acad Audiol (2013) 1.12

Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol (2004) 1.11

Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys (2001) 1.07

The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.02

Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am (1988) 0.97

Speech segregation in rooms: monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 0.90

Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit. J Am Acad Audiol (2014) 0.89

An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function. Int J Audiol (2013) 0.89

Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 0.87

Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.87

Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension. Int J Audiol (2015) 0.87

Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.87

Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes. Am J Audiol (2007) 0.84

Effects of room reverberation and noise on speech discrimination by the elderly. Audiology (1985) 0.81

Binaural dereverberation based on interaural coherence histograms. J Acoust Soc Am (2013) 0.78

Effects of reverberation and noise on speech recognition by adults with various amounts of sensorineural hearing impairment. Audiology (1990) 0.78

Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level. J Acoust Soc Am (2014) 0.77