A mixed methods study of how clinician 'super users' influence others during the implementation of electronic health records.

PubWeight™: 0.80‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4407776)

Published in BMC Med Inform Decis Mak on April 10, 2015

Authors

Christina T Yuan1, Elizabeth H Bradley2, Ingrid M Nembhard2

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA. christina.yuan@yale.edu.
2: Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.

Articles cited by this

Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med (2006) 24.62

Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol (2001) 14.59

Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res (2007) 10.21

Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) (2005) 9.63

Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) (2004) 7.20

Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res (2010) 5.97

Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2007) 4.46

Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation (2009) 4.28

How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res (1999) 3.30

Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol (2001) 3.12

Health care information technology: progress and barriers. JAMA (2004) 2.62

Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med (2014) 2.35

Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res (2013) 2.24

A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q (1978) 1.23

The role of cognitive and learning theories in supporting successful EHR system implementation training: a qualitative study. Med Care Res Rev (2012) 1.08

Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2006) 1.04

Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies. Health Policy (2007) 0.99

Explaining physicians' use of EMR systems and performance in the shakedown phase. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 0.97

What is the experience of national quality campaigns? Views from the field. Health Serv Res (2010) 0.95

Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation. Inform Prim Care (2011) 0.95

The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems. Med Care Res Rev (2008) 0.87

Essential steps in super user education for ambulatory clinic nurses. Urol Nurs (2009) 0.80

Identification and conceptualization of nurse super users. J Healthc Inf Manag (2006) 0.80

A super user group for your electronic health record! Comput Inform Nurs (2013) 0.77