The interplay of contextual elements in implementation: an ethnographic case study.

PubWeight™: 0.81‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4345021)

Published in BMC Health Serv Res on February 14, 2015

Authors

Megan B McCullough1, Ann F Chou2, Jeffrey L Solomon3, Beth Ann Petrakis4, Bo Kim5, Angela M Park6, Ashley J Benedict7, Alison B Hamilton8,9, Adam J Rose10,11

Author Affiliations

1: VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, ENRM Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. Megan.Mccullough@va.gov.
2: The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Ann-Chou@ouhsc.edu.
3: VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, ENRM Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. Jeffrey.Solomon@va.gov.
4: VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, ENRM Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. BethAnn.Petrakis@va.gov.
5: VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, ENRM Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. Bo.Kim@va.gov.
6: VA New England Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA. Angela.Park@va.gov.
7: VA Sunshine Healthcare Network, St. Petersburg, FL, USA. Ashley.Benedict@va.gov.
8: VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. alisonh@ucla.edu.
9: University of California, LA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. alisonh@ucla.edu.
10: VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, ENRM Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. Adam.Rose@va.gov.
11: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Adam.Rose@va.gov.

Articles cited by this

Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q (2004) 34.12

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci (2009) 21.66

Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. BMJ (2001) 8.06

Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci (2008) 6.11

Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med (2007) 5.29

Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care (2002) 4.99

Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of 'context'. J Adv Nurs (2002) 3.69

A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf (2008) 3.26

Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q (2012) 2.64

The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q (2010) 2.59

A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci (2010) 2.10

A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci (2011) 2.09

Variation in warfarin dose adjustment practice is responsible for differences in the quality of anticoagulation control between centers and countries: an analysis of patients receiving warfarin in the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation (2012) 1.91

Risk-adjusted percent time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator for outpatient oral anticoagulation: results of the Veterans Affairs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2010) 1.50

The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implement Sci (2013) 1.47

Effect of a simple two-step warfarin dosing algorithm on anticoagulant control as measured by time in therapeutic range: a pilot study. J Thromb Haemost (2009) 1.04

Measuring quality of oral anticoagulation care: extending quality measurement to a new field. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf (2009) 1.03

Prompt repeat testing after out-of-range INR values: a quality indicator for anticoagulation care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2011) 0.96

Gaps in monitoring during oral anticoagulation: insights into care transitions, monitoring barriers, and medication nonadherence. Chest (2013) 0.95

A qualitative study of contextual factors' impact on measures to reduce surgery cancellations. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.88

INR targets and site-level anticoagulation control: results from the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA). J Thromb Haemost (2012) 0.84