Published in Stat Med on May 18, 2015
Prioritized Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk | NCT01420016
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review. BMJ (2016) 2.81
Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review. Acta Inform Med (2016) 0.75
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation (2008) 26.42
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J (1991) 21.65
Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA (2001) 17.91
A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol (1982) 11.13
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation (2013) 10.24
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med (2005) 4.87
Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med (2009) 4.09
Linking automated databases for research in managed care settings. Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.25
Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches. Med Care (2010) 2.01
Multicenter epidemiologic and health services research on therapeutics in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf (2002) 1.79
Looking beyond historical patient outcomes to improve clinical models. Sci Transl Med (2012) 1.59
Bayesian networks in biomedicine and health-care. Artif Intell Med (2004) 1.54
Comparison of machine learning techniques with classical statistical models in predicting health outcomes. Stud Health Technol Inform (2004) 1.29
The Framingham study: a prospective study of coronary heart disease. Fed Proc (1962) 1.29
Models to predict cardiovascular risk: comparison of CART, multilayer perceptron and logistic regression. Proc AMIA Symp (2000) 1.06
Feature selection in Bayesian classifiers for the prognosis of survival of cirrhotic patients treated with TIPS. J Biomed Inform (2005) 1.05
Machine learning for survival analysis: a case study on recurrence of prostate cancer. Artif Intell Med (2000) 0.94
Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling. Artif Intell Med (2009) 0.89
Experiments to determine whether recursive partitioning (CART) or an artificial neural network overcomes theoretical limitations of Cox proportional hazards regression. Comput Biomed Res (1998) 0.89
The effect of assuming independence in applying Bayes' theorem to risk estimation and classification in diagnosis. Comput Biomed Res (1983) 0.86
Predicting survival in malignant skin melanoma using Bayesian networks automatically induced by genetic algorithms. An empirical comparison between different approaches. Artif Intell Med (1998) 0.81
Learning Bayesian networks from survival data using weighting censored instances. J Biomed Inform (2010) 0.79
Predicting Consumer Effort in Finding and Paying for Health Care: Expert Interviews and Claims Data Analysis. JMIR Med Inform (2017) 0.75