Using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data to assess colonoscopy quality outcomes of a web-enhanced implementation toolkit to support evidence-based practices for bowel preparation: a study protocol.

Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther (2002) 13.95

The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci (2011) 11.79

Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ (1997) 10.22

A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 7.86

Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health (2008) 7.18

Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health (2011) 6.69

Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci (2008) 6.11

Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2002) 5.47

How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology (2004) 4.69

Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 4.38

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 4.17

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 3.83

Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 3.69

Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Med Care Res Rev (2008) 3.56

Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med (2008) 3.08

Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 2.82

Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res (1991) 2.65

Illiteracy among Medicaid recipients and its relationship to health care costs. J Health Care Poor Underserved (1994) 2.30

Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 2.22

Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci (2009) 2.22

Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 2.15

A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci (2010) 2.10

Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 2.09

A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci (2011) 2.09

Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 2.04

Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut (2012) 1.83

Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2012) 1.76

Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis (2010) 1.57

Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol (2011) 1.52

Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011) 1.35

Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med (2012) 1.30

Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med (2014) 1.29

Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study. Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 1.14

The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol (2010) 1.06

Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 1.05

Measuring patients' experiences with individual specialist physicians and their practices. Am J Med Qual (2009) 1.01

Measuring perceptions of innovation adoption: the diffusion of a federal drug prevention policy. Health Educ Res (2002) 0.97

Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 0.91

Measuring the quality of endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 0.86

Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. ANS Adv Nurs Sci (1986) 0.82

Enhancing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: an integrative review. Gastroenterol Nurs (2012) 0.81

Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: a study protocol. Implement Sci (2011) 0.81

Disparities in colorectal cancer screening behaviors: implications for African American men. Gastroenterol Nurs (2012) 0.79

Patterns of relating between physicians and medical assistants in small family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med (2014) 0.76