A face detection bias for horizontal orientations develops in middle childhood.

PubWeight™: 0.77‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4459095)

Published in Front Psychol on June 08, 2015

Authors

Benjamin J Balas1, Jamie Schmidt1, Alyson Saville1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Psychology, Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, North Dakota State University Fargo, ND, USA.

Articles citing this

An Own-Age Bias in Recognizing Faces with Horizontal Information. Front Aging Neurosci (2016) 0.75

Articles cited by this

The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis (1997) 62.63

The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis (1997) 42.97

The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res (2009) 11.53

Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. J Cogn Neurosci (1996) 7.89

Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A (1993) 5.78

The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci (2002) 5.61

Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science (2002) 4.61

Configurational information in face perception. Perception (1987) 4.43

The other-race effect develops during infancy: evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychol Sci (2007) 3.21

Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2006) 3.10

Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nat Neurosci (2002) 2.43

Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol Sci (2005) 2.07

Development of the other-race effect during infancy: evidence toward universality? J Exp Child Psychol (2009) 1.87

Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers. Vision Res (1999) 1.69

A Domain-General Theory of the Development of Perceptual Discrimination. Curr Dir Psychol Sci (2007) 1.63

Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Res (1999) 1.50

Early maturity of face recognition: no childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition (2009) 1.45

Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect. J Exp Child Psychol (2006) 1.31

ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clin Neurophysiol (1999) 1.31

Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification. Percept Psychophys (1996) 1.23

Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. J Exp Child Psychol (2001) 1.20

Class information predicts activation by object fragments in human object areas. J Cogn Neurosci (2008) 1.16

Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Vision Res (2007) 1.11

Early experience predicts later plasticity for face processing: evidence for the reactivation of dormant effects. Psychol Sci (2009) 1.10

Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features. J Exp Child Psychol (2004) 1.07

Quantifying facial expression recognition across viewing conditions. Vision Res (2005) 1.07

What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2011) 1.06

Biological "bar codes" in human faces. J Vis (2009) 1.06

Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition. Perception (1994) 1.05

Early Visually Evoked Electrophysiological Responses Over the Human Brain (P1, N170) Show Stable Patterns of Face-Sensitivity from 4 years to Adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci (2010) 1.02

Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing. Front Psychol (2010) 0.99

A warning about median reaction time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1988) 0.98

Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies. Psychol Res (2005) 0.94

The development of spatial frequency biases in face recognition. J Exp Child Psychol (2010) 0.90

Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Vision Res (2008) 0.89

Categorizing facial identities, emotions, and genders: attention to high- and low-spatial frequencies by children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol (2004) 0.88

Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory. Dev Sci (2004) 0.86

Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception. Vision Res (2009) 0.86

Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception. J Vis (2011) 0.86

Sensitivity to Information Conveyed by Horizontal Contours is Correlated with Face Identification Accuracy. Front Psychol (2013) 0.85

The horizontal tuning of face perception relies on the processing of intermediate and high spatial frequencies. J Vis (2011) 0.84

Children (but not adults) judge similarity in own- and other-race faces by the color of their skin. J Exp Child Psychol (2014) 0.84

Interattribute Distances do not Represent the Identity of Real World Faces. Front Psychol (2010) 0.83

Emotion recognition (sometimes) depends on horizontal orientations. Atten Percept Psychophys (2014) 0.80

Face perception is tuned to horizontal orientation in the N170 time window. J Vis (2014) 0.80

Developing a side bias for conspecific faces during childhood. Dev Psychol (2011) 0.79

Children's neural response to contrast-negated faces is species specific. J Exp Child Psychol (2013) 0.77