Published in J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci on July 01, 2015
Tough decisions about protocol review. Lab Anim (NY) (2017) 0.75
Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2017) 0.75
Ethical scores for animal experiments. Nature (1992) 5.43
Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 2.98
Recognizing and assessing pain, suffering and distress in laboratory animals: a survey of current practice in the UK with recommendations. Lab Anim (2002) 2.35
Deficiencies in the National Institute of Health's guidelines for the care and protection of laboratory animals. J Med Philos (1993) 2.08
Association of hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient-centered outcomes of total knee replacement in a population-based cohort of patients age 65 years and older. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 1.78
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees. J Med Ethics (2007) 1.69
The refining influence of ethics committees on animal experimentation in Sweden. Lab Anim (2003) 1.12
Learning and retaining simulated arthroscopic meniscal repair skills. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012) 1.04
Survey of Canadian animal-based researchers' views on the Three Rs: replacement, reduction and refinement. PLoS One (2011) 1.02
Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture. J Med Ethics (2009) 1.02
The silent majority: who speaks at IRB meetings? IRB (2012) 1.02
Animal ethical evaluation: an observational study of Canadian IACUCs. Ethics Behav (2003) 1.01
A study of three IACUCs and their views of scientific merit and alternatives. J Appl Anim Welf Sci (2002) 1.00
The interpretation and application of the three Rs by animal ethics committee members. Altern Lab Anim (2005) 0.94
How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule? Acad Med (2012) 0.93
Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American Institutions. Animals (Basel) (2012) 0.92
Trust and regulatory organisations: the role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review. Soc Stud Sci (2012) 0.89
Ethics: views from IACUC members. Altern Lab Anim (2009) 0.89
The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2012) 0.89
Sentience and sensation. Lab Anim (NY) (2008) 0.88
Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity. J Med Ethics (2012) 0.88
A self-assessment survey of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Part 1: animal welfare and protocol compliance. Lab Anim (NY) (2012) 0.83
The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: a proposal for a system to support decision-making. Lab Anim (1999) 0.82
Evaluating the ethical acceptability of animal research. Lab Anim (NY) (2014) 0.81
Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Med Health Care Philos (1998) 0.81
The ethical judgment of animal research. Ethics Behav (1992) 0.81
Developing standards in animal research review. J Am Vet Med Assoc (1989) 0.81
Prior ethical review of animal versus human subjects research. Invest Radiol (1988) 0.81
Comparison of student self-assessment with faculty assessment of clinical competence. J Vet Med Educ (2011) 0.80
A case for integrity: gains from including more than animal welfare in animal ethics committee deliberations. Lab Anim (2014) 0.77