The path of ambivalence: tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4505081)

Published in Front Psychol on July 17, 2015

Authors

Iris K Schneider1, Frenk van Harreveld2, Mark Rotteveel2, Sascha Topolinski3, Joop van der Pligt2, Norbert Schwarz4, Sander L Koole5

Author Affiliations

1: Mind and Society Center, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
3: Department of Psychology, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
4: Mind and Society Center, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
5: Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Articles cited by this

Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull (1991) 11.38

On the automatic activation of attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol (1986) 4.12

Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci (2010) 3.75

Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (2005) 2.86

The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. J Pers Soc Psychol (1992) 2.30

Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? J Pers Soc Psychol (2001) 2.03

Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. J Pers Soc Psychol (1986) 1.95

MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav Res Methods (2010) 1.57

The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. J Pers Soc Psychol (1996) 1.47

Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement. Cognition (2007) 1.44

Grasping intentions: from thought experiments to empirical evidence. Front Hum Neurosci (2012) 1.31

Emotion and motivated behavior: postural adjustments to affective picture viewing. Biol Psychol (2004) 1.29

Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front Psychol (2011) 1.21

Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? J Pers Soc Psychol (2002) 1.17

What's in a name: implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. J Pers Soc Psychol (2001) 1.13

Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychol Sci (2009) 1.09

The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (2009) 1.05

Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. J Pers Soc Psychol (2006) 1.03

The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychol Sci (2009) 0.89

Posture as index for approach-avoidance behavior. PLoS One (2012) 0.88

Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice. Br J Health Psychol (2001) 0.87

Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups J Exp Soc Psychol (1996) 0.86

One way and the other: the bidirectional relationship between ambivalence and body movement. Psychol Sci (2013) 0.84

Ambivalence and information integration in attitudinal judgment. Br J Soc Psychol (2004) 0.81

In doubt and disorderly: Ambivalence promotes compensatory perceptions of order. J Exp Psychol Gen (2014) 0.78