Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort.

PubWeight™: 1.01‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMID 26327354)

Published in J Urol on August 29, 2015

Authors

Lisa F Newcomb1, Ian M Thompson2, Hilary D Boyer3, James D Brooks4, Peter R Carroll5, Matthew R Cooperberg5, Atreya Dash6, William J Ellis7, Ladan Fazli8, Ziding Feng3, Martin E Gleave8, Priya Kunju9, Raymond S Lance10, Jesse K McKenney11, Maxwell V Meng5, Marlo M Nicolas2, Martin G Sanda12, Jeffry Simko5, Alan So8, Maria S Tretiakova7, Dean A Troyer10, Lawrence D True7, Funda Vakar-Lopez7, Jeff Virgin6, Andrew A Wagner12, John T Wei9, Yingye Zheng3, Peter S Nelson3, Daniel W Lin13, Canary PASS Investigators

Author Affiliations

1: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
2: University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
3: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
4: Stanford University, Stanford, California.
5: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
6: Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
7: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
8: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
9: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
10: Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
11: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
12: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
13: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: dlin@uw.edu.

Associated clinical trials:

Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) | NCT00756665

Articles cited by this

Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med (2012) 24.06

Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med (2012) 15.83

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol (2005) 12.31

20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA (2005) 12.25

Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 9.45

Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 8.93

A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (1998) 8.33

Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower-risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 5.42

Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol (2011) 5.27

Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol (1974) 5.26

Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol (2014) 5.01

Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Cancer (2008) 4.77

Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol (2007) 4.56

Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol (2012) 4.48

The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2005) 4.40

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol (2012) 4.24

Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 2.96

Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 2.70

Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer (2006) 1.97

Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly. Eur Urol (2014) 1.80

Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. Cancer (2013) 1.75

Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study: design of a multi-institutional active surveillance cohort and biorepository. Urology (2009) 1.46

The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study. J Urol (2011) 1.33

Prostate cancer, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2013) 1.32

Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. J Urol (2003) 1.26

Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens. J Urol (2011) 1.19

Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol (2005) 1.12

Articles by these authors

Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2016) 1.29

Abiraterone treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer selects for progesterone responsive mutant androgen receptors. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 1.27

Plasma choline metabolites and colorectal cancer risk in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Cancer Res (2014) 0.98

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems. Am J Prev Med (2016) 0.77

American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy Update. J Urol (2017) 0.75

Validation of a Novel Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2016) 0.75

Development of a 90-minute integrated non-invasive urinary assay for bladder cancer detection. J Urol (2017) 0.75

Timing of Adverse Prostate Cancer Reclassification on First Surveillance Biopsy: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study. J Urol (2016) 0.75

Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies. Cancer (2017) 0.75

AUA White Paper on Nonneurogenic Chronic Urinary Retention: Consensus Definition, Treatment Algorithm, and Outcome End Points. J Urol (2017) 0.75

Association of Tissue Abiraterone Levels and SLCO Genotype with Intraprostatic Steroids and Pathologic Response in Men with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 0.75