Published in BMC Res Notes on September 29, 2015
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA (1990) 10.89
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 7.52
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA (1994) 4.85
An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 4.25
Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA (2002) 3.52
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.36
Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA (2003) 3.36
Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2006) 2.53
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA (1998) 2.49
The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA (1994) 2.00
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA (1998) 1.99
Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc (2001) 1.88
From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J (2012) 1.79
More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 1.71
Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol (1990) 1.55
Factors associated with the full publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. J Urol (2007) 1.40
Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth (1993) 1.25
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int (2004) 1.23
Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (1996) 1.16
Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. JAMA (1994) 1.12
The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause (2008) 1.12
Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1993) 1.11
Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles. BJU Int (2012) 1.10
Publication rates following pancreas meetings. Pancreas (2001) 1.04
Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period. Ann Surg (2010) 0.96
The consistency between scientific papers presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their subsequent full-text publication. J Orthop Trauma (2006) 0.91
The publication rate and impact of abstracts presented at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (1999-2005). Heart Lung Circ (2008) 0.91
Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting. Plast Reconstr Surg (2003) 0.91
Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication? BMC Med Res Methodol (2009) 0.85
Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings. Acta Orthop (2007) 0.85
Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the orthopaedic trauma association. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 0.84
An analysis of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Neuroscience from 2001 to 2006. PLoS One (2008) 0.82
Study for the quality assessment of abstracts presented to Italian public health national conferences: a six years survey. Ann Ig (2013) 0.77