Published in Int J Clin Oncol on October 27, 2015
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med (2011) 24.32
Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med (1998) 9.43
Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med (2000) 7.62
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 4.41
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2009) 3.37
Venous thromboembolic events with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of patients in randomized phase II and III studies. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.76
Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg (2001) 2.40
Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg (1998) 2.24
Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. Eur Radiol (2011) 2.03
Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature. Am Surg (2004) 1.99
Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology (1990) 1.83
Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol (2008) 1.67
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2000) 1.62
Arm placement of the Cook titanium Petite Vital-Port: results of radiologic placement in 125 patients with cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J (2000) 1.60
Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: study of 134 patients over 24,596 catheter days. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1997) 1.55
Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann Oncol (2007) 1.52
Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1997) 1.49
Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology (2001) 1.41
2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group. Ann Oncol (2009) 1.41
Metastatic colon cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2013) 1.31
Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2001) 1.30
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.21
Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol (1998) 1.21
Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients?: analysis of a large bi-institutional experience. Cancer (2007) 1.11
Sonographically guided placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters: review of 355 procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1998) 1.10
Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2010) 0.96
Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2005) 0.90
Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol (2002) 0.90
Catheter fracture: a rare complication of totally implantable subclavian venous access devices. J Surg Oncol (1996) 0.90
A comparison between distal and proximal port device insertion in head and neck cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol (2007) 0.87
Peripheral insertion of a central venous access device under fluoroscopic guidance using a peripherally accessed system (PAS) port in the forearm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (1998) 0.84
Which is the easiest and safest technique for central venous access? A retrospective survey of more than 5,400 cases. J Vasc Access (2007) 0.83
Experience with the P.A.S.-PORT venous access device in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol (1996) 0.81
Arm port implantation in cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol (2010) 0.80
Totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy administration and autologous stem cell transplantation: analysis of overall and septic complications in 68 cases using a single type of device. Bone Marrow Transplant (1999) 0.77
Vascular access options for outpatient cancer therapy. Am J Surg (1987) 0.76