Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?

PubWeight™: 1.71‹?› | Rank: Top 3%

🔗 View Article (PMC 4640582)

Published in PLoS Biol on November 10, 2015

Authors

Dominique G Roche1,2, Loeske E B Kruuk1,3, Robert Lanfear1,4, Sandra A Binning1,2

Author Affiliations

1: Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
2: Éco-Éthologie, Institut de Biologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
3: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
4: Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Articles cited by this

Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat Genet (2008) 8.24

Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One (2011) 6.48

On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. PeerJ (2013) 5.11

Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS One (2011) 4.41

Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS One (2009) 4.09

SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture. Science (2015) 3.56

Data archiving is a good investment. Nature (2011) 3.53

Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comput Biol (2013) 3.06

Supplementary data need to be kept in public repositories. Nature (2005) 2.86

Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS One (2011) 2.47

Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science (2011) 2.20

Data archiving. Am Nat (2010) 2.08

Archiving Primary Data: Solutions for Long-Term Studies. Trends Ecol Evol (2015) 2.07

Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed. Trends Ecol Evol (2013) 1.97

Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. FASEB J (2013) 1.86

Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ (2013) 1.79

Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends Ecol Evol (2010) 1.46

Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program STRUCTURE. Mol Ecol (2012) 1.42

Data sharing: how much doesn't get submitted to GenBank? PLoS Biol (2006) 1.37

Public sharing of research datasets: a pilot study of associations. J Informetr (2010) 1.33

Data publication consensus and controversies. F1000Res (2014) 1.32

Lost branches on the tree of life. PLoS Biol (2013) 1.26

What drives academic data sharing? PLoS One (2015) 1.25

Troubleshooting public data archiving: suggestions to increase participation. PLoS Biol (2014) 1.21

The dawn of open access to phylogenetic data. PLoS One (2014) 1.18

Data deposition: Fees could damage public data archives. Nature (2013) 1.11

Data sharing in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol (2005) 1.11

Do corresponding authors take responsibility for their work? A covert survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.04

Recommendations for the role of publishers in access to data. PLoS Biol (2014) 1.01

Data-sharing: Everything on display. Nature (2013) 1.00

Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. PLoS One (2012) 0.97

It's Good to Share: Why Environmental Scientists' Ethics Are Out of Date. Bioscience (2014) 0.95

The need for archiving data in evolutionary biology. J Evol Biol (2010) 0.89

First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation. J R Soc Interface (2015) 0.89

DataUp: A tool to help researchers describe and share tabular data. F1000Res (2014) 0.87

What should be the data sharing policy of cognitive science? Top Cogn Sci (2013) 0.84

Open data: crediting a culture of cooperation. Science (2013) 0.82