Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

PubWeight™: 1.00‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMID 26892667)

Published in Health Qual Life Outcomes on February 19, 2016

Authors

Antonia V Bennett1, Amylou C Dueck2, Sandra A Mitchell3, Tito R Mendoza4, Bryce B Reeve5, Thomas M Atkinson6, Kathleen M Castro7, Andrea Denicoff8, Lauren J Rogak9, Jay K Harness10, James D Bearden11, Donna Bryant12, Robert D Siegel13, Deborah Schrag14, Ethan Basch15,16, National Cancer Institute PRO-CTCAE Study Group

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. avbenn@unc.edu.
2: Division of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA. dueck@mayo.edu.
3: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 3-448, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. mitchlls@mail.nih.gov.
4: Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1450, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. tmendoza@mdanderson.org.
5: Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. bbreeve@email.unc.edu.
6: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA. atkinsot@mskcc.org.
7: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 3-448, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. kathleen.castro@nih.gov.
8: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9737, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. denicofa@mail.nih.gov.
9: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. rogakl@mskcc.org.
10: The Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, St. Joseph Hospital of Orange, 1100 West Stewart Drive, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. jkharness@gmail.com.
11: Gibbs Cancer Center and Research Institute, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, 101 East Wood Street, Spartanburg, SC, 29303, USA. jbearden@srhs.com.
12: The Cancer Program of Our Lady of the Lake and Mary Bird Perkins, 1950 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA. dbryantnp@cox.net.
13: Hartford Hospital-Helen and Harry Gray Cancer Center, 85 Retreat Avenue, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA. ROBERT_SIEGEL@bshsi.org.
14: Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, D-1008, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. deb_schrag@dfci.harvard.edu.
15: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. ebasch@med.unc.edu.
16: Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. ebasch@med.unc.edu.

Associated clinical trials:

Validation Study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) | NCT02158637

Articles cited by this

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst (1993) 38.99

Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med (1998) 6.80

Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract (2010) 5.89

Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health (2008) 3.99

Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health (2008) 3.68

An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report. Biol Psychiatry (2005) 3.03

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol (2015) 2.09

Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst (2014) 2.01

Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst (2014) 1.72

Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians. Qual Life Res (2011) 1.45

Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity. J Clin Epidemiol (2014) 1.34

A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer (2013) 1.21

Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research. Orthopedics (2001) 1.08

Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Transl Behav Med (2011) 1.07

Assessing the onset of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction using interactive voice response technology. J Clin Psychiatry (2007) 1.06

PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force. Value Health (2014) 1.03

Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2015) 0.98

Comparison between patient-reported and clinician-observed symptoms in oncology. Cancer Nurs (2013) 0.97

Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and interactive voice response system versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res (2013) 0.89

Measurement equivalence of interactive voice response and paper versions of the EQ-5D in a cancer patient sample. Value Health (2011) 0.86

Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper. Qual Life Res (2015) 0.79