Comparison of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stent efficacies for treating left main and/or three-vessel disease: a propensity matched study.

PubWeight™: 0.77‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 26936450)

Published in Heart Vessels on March 02, 2016

Authors

Norihiro Kobayashi1, Yoshiaki Ito2, Keisuke Hirano2, Masahiro Yamawaki2, Motoharu Araki2, Tsuyoshi Sakai2, Hideyuki Takimura2, Yasunari Sakamoto2, Shinsuke Mori2, Masakazu Tsutsumi2, Takuro Takama2, Hiroya Takafuji2, Takashi Maruyama2, Yohsuke Honda2, Takahiro Tokuda2, Kenji Makino2, Shigemitsu Shirai2, Toshiya Muramatsu2

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan. ovation17@gmail.com.
2: Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.

Articles cited by this

Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med (2007) 25.17

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med (2009) 17.17

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med (2009) 13.42

A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med (2002) 12.84

A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med (2004) 11.86

Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation (2007) 11.69

Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 8.27

Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation (2004) 5.44

2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation (2011) 5.09

Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 5.02

Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet (2010) 4.87

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet (2013) 4.34

Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med (2011) 3.55

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2010) 2.89

Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study. Circulation (2008) 2.64

Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol (2011) 2.02

Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 1.56

Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 1.35

Final 5-year outcomes from the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent clinical trial program: comparison of safety and efficacy with first-generation drug-eluting and bare-metal stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 1.28

Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Cardiol (2013) 1.23

5-year clinical outcomes of the ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study II) of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol (2010) 1.21

Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 1.14

Evaluation in 3 months duration of neointimal coverage after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation by optical coherence tomography: the ENDEAVOR OCT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2009) 1.07

Endeavour zotarolimus-eluting stent reduces stent thrombosis and improves clinical outcomes compared with cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 4-year results of the PROTECT randomized trial. Eur Heart J (2014) 1.07

Does "late catch-up" exist in drug-eluting stents: insights from a serial quantitative coronary angiography analysis of sirolimus versus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am Heart J (2010) 1.03

Short- and long-term benefits of drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents even in treatment for large coronary arteries. Heart Vessels (2015) 0.87

Comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients undergoing multilesion and multivessel intervention: the SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2010) 0.86

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-world clinical practice. Heart Vessels (2014) 0.77

Two-year outcomes of everolimus vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main lesions: a propensity score matching comparison of patients included in the French Left Main Taxus (FLM Taxus) and the LEft MAin Xience (LEMAX) registries. EuroIntervention (2013) 0.77

Late restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol (2007) 0.77