Published in J Cancer Educ on April 02, 2016
Translation and adaptation of skin cancer genomic risk education materials for implementation in primary care. J Community Genet (2016) 0.76
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study. Glob Qual Nurs Res (2017) 0.75
Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med (2003) 8.76
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med (2003) 7.58
The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 5.29
The Havasupai Indian tribe case--lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N Engl J Med (2010) 4.42
Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol (2006) 4.30
Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst (1998) 3.89
Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A (2009) 3.04
Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health (2009) 2.93
Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med (1996) 2.52
Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? Arch Intern Med (2005) 2.43
Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol (2003) 2.41
Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol (2008) 2.21
The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nat Rev Genet (2004) 2.17
Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. J Cancer Educ (2012) 2.03
Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review. J Health Commun (2011) 1.95
Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg (2009) 1.90
African Americans' participation in clinical research: importance, barriers, and solutions. Am J Surg (2007) 1.88
Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A (2006) 1.80
Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation. IRB (2008) 1.56
Effect of pictograms on readability of patient information materials. Ann Pharmacother (2003) 1.55
Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design. JAMA Pediatr (2013) 1.55
Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking. PLoS One (2010) 1.45
Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genet Med (2013) 1.31
Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain't always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev (1996) 1.20
Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS). Health Expect (2008) 1.15
Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2007) 1.15
Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women. Cancer (2011) 1.14
Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2013) 1.03
Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med (2013) 0.99
Randomization to standard and concise informed consent forms: development of evidence-based consent practices. Contemp Clin Trials (2012) 0.95
Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 0.95
Two decades' experience with a prospective biobank for urologic oncology: research, clinical care, and the patients' view. Urol Oncol (2012) 0.95
A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results. Clin Trials (2014) 0.89
Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit. Am J Health Promot (2009) 0.86
Health literacy, self-efficacy, and patients' assessment of medical disclosure and consent documentation. Health Commun (2011) 0.85
Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking. IRB (2012) 0.84
Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. J Community Genet (2015) 0.79