Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Hormone Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 27124410)

Published in PLoS One on April 28, 2016

Authors

Anna Miquel-Cases1, Valesca P Retèl1, Bianca Lederer2, Gunter von Minckwitz2, Lotte M G Steuten3, Wim H van Harten1,4

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2: German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
3: Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States of America.
4: University of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Associated clinical trials:

I-SPY 2 TRIAL: Neoadjuvant and Personalized Adaptive Novel Agents to Treat Breast Cancer (I-SPY 2) | NCT01042379

Bevacizumab, Everolimus (RAD001), and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimes for Primary Breast Cancer (GeparQuinto) | NCT00567554

A Translational Trial on Molecular Markers and Functional Imaging to Predict Response of Preoperative Treatment of Breast Cancer Early (PROMIX) | NCT00957125

Articles cited by this

Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet (2005) 42.90

Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet (2011) 10.62

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (1998) 9.32

The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ (1995) 5.55

Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol (2001) 5.28

Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making (1998) 5.14

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst (2001) 5.09

Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2013) 3.29

Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol (2014) 2.75

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol (2014) 2.55

Use of [(18)F]-FDG PET to predict response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, and addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and docetaxel in [(18)F]-FDG PET-predicted non-responders (AVATAXHER): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol (2014) 2.28

Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J (2004) 1.89

Breast cancer version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2014) 1.63

Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol (2011) 1.59

Health state utilities for non small cell lung cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2008) 1.56

Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer (2006) 1.50

Neoadjuvant treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Ann Oncol (2012) 1.43

The long-term cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Eur Heart J (2006) 1.36

Costs of heart failure-related hospitalizations in patients aged 18 to 64 years. Am J Manag Care (2010) 1.25

Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer. Qual Life Res (2007) 1.24

Estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive breast cancer is not a reproducible subtype. Breast Cancer Res (2013) 1.23

Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017. Cancer (2013) 1.20

Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2001) 1.18

Evaluation of direct medical costs of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Cancer (2010) 1.15

Costs and outcomes associated with hospitalized cancer patients with neutropenic complications: A retrospective study. Exp Ther Med (2011) 1.14

Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer (2010) 1.12

Can diffusion-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging precisely evaluate and predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat (2012) 1.10

Survival benefit from response-guided approach: a direct effect of more effective cytotoxic regimens or an indirect effect of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea? J Clin Oncol (2014) 1.09

Evaluating the total costs of chemotherapy-induced toxicity: results from a pilot study with ovarian cancer patients. Oncologist (2001) 1.04

Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2008) 1.02

Resource use and costs associated with different states of breast cancer. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2007) 1.00

FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast (2013) 0.97

Improving early cycle economic evaluation of diagnostic technologies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2014) 0.96

Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol (2012) 0.95

Selecting the neoadjuvant treatment by molecular subtype: how to maximize the benefit? Breast (2013) 0.95

Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: reviewing the state of the science and exploring new research directions. J Clin Oncol (2008) 0.89

18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol (2012) 0.87

Development of an economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of hawthorn extract as an adjunct treatment for heart failure in Australia. BMJ Open (2012) 0.84

Insight or confusion: survival after response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2013) 0.79

Anthropometric reference data for elderly Swedes and its disease-related pattern. Eur J Clin Nutr (2015) 0.79

Quality of life among women treated for breast cancer: a survey of three procedures in Mexico. Aesthetic Plast Surg (2014) 0.77

Survival benefit from response-guided approach: a direct effect of more effective cytotoxic regimens or an indirect effect of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea? Reply to K.-D. Yu et al. J Clin Oncol (2014) 0.76

Articles by these authors

Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet (2014) 9.66

Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2016) 1.84

Does toxicity predict efficacy? Insight into the mechanism of action of lapatinib. J Clin Oncol (2014) 1.13

Standardized Ki67 Diagnostics Using Automated Scoring--Clinical Validation in the GeparTrio Breast Cancer Study. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 0.89

Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer. Breast (2015) 0.89

Management of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or febrile neutropenia. Breast Care (Basel) (2014) 0.88

The importance of supportive care in breast cancer patients. Breast Care (Basel) (2014) 0.78

Breast Cancer Diagnosed During Pregnancy: Adapting Recent Advances in Breast Cancer Care for Pregnant Patients. JAMA Oncol (2015) 0.77

Integrated Analysis of PTEN and p4EBP1 Protein Expression as Predictors for pCR in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 0.77

Pathological complete response in breast cancer--authors' reply. Lancet (2015) 0.76

Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer-the road to new treatment strategies. Lancet (2016) 0.76

Randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE). Eur J Cancer (2017) 0.75

Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol (2017) 0.75

Current approach of the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Lancet (2017) 0.75