Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 27175093)

Published in J Pain Res on April 27, 2016

Authors

Dagmar Amtmann1, Jiseon Kim1, Hyewon Chung2, Robert L Askew3, Ryoungsun Park4, Karon F Cook5

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
2: Department of Education, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
3: Department of Psychology, Stetson University, Deland, FL, USA.
4: Theoretical and Behavioral Foundations Division, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
5: Department of Medical Social Science, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Articles cited by this

A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (1960) 90.89

Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA (1999) 40.00

Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol (1967) 22.39

Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care (2003) 19.69

A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (1983) 16.05

Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain (2001) 16.05

Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain (2005) 11.80

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 6.24

Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 4.29

Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment (2011) 4.21

Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 4.18

Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. J Pain Symptom Manage (2002) 3.35

Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J (2007) 3.27

Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain (2010) 2.85

Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof (2005) 2.69

Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res (2005) 2.55

Using chronic pain to predict depressive morbidity in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2003) 2.45

Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther (1998) 2.35

Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.24

A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. J Clin Epidemiol (2004) 2.14

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res (2006) 1.68

Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference. J Rheumatol (2001) 1.64

Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice. J Pain Symptom Manage (2007) 1.62

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Qual Life Res (2010) 1.48

Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Serv Res (2005) 1.34

Symptoms of distress as prospective predictors of pain-related sciatica treatment outcomes. Pain (2006) 1.02

Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study. J Psychiatr Res (2014) 1.00

Definition of clinical differences. J Rheumatol (2006) 0.99

Effect of depression treatment on chronic pain outcomes. Psychosom Med (2009) 0.92

Meaningful change in oncology quality-of-life instruments: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2012) 0.86

Measurement invariance of the PROMIS pain interference item bank across community and clinical samples. Qual Life Res (2012) 0.83

Minimal clinically important differences in the brief pain inventory in patients with bone metastases. Support Care Cancer (2013) 0.79