How can we objectively categorise partnership type? A novel classification of population survey data to inform epidemiological research and clinical practice.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 27535765)

Published in Sex Transm Infect on August 17, 2016

Authors

C H Mercer1, K G Jones1, A M Johnson1, R Lewis2,3, K R Mitchell2,4, Kirsten Gravningen5, S Clifton1, C Tanton1, P Sonnenberg1, K Wellings2, J A Cassell6, C S Estcourt7,8

Author Affiliations

1: Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK.
2: Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, Centre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
3: Department of Sociology, University of the Pacific, Stockton, USA.
4: MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
5: Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromsø, Norway Research Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
6: Division of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
7: Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
8: Barts Sexual Health Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.

Articles cited by this

Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet (2013) 4.86

Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet (2013) 3.42

Methodology of the third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Sex Transm Infect (2013) 3.08

Do people really know their sex partners? Concurrency, knowledge of partner behavior, and sexually transmitted infections within partnerships. Sex Transm Dis (2004) 2.19

Raiding the public health budget. BMJ (2014) 2.12

Who has sex with whom? Characteristics of heterosexual partnerships reported in a national probability survey and implications for STI risk. Int J Epidemiol (2008) 2.06

What you don't know can hurt you: perceptions of sex-partner concurrency and partner-reported behavior. J Adolesc Health (2006) 1.76

Patterns of sexual partnerships among adolescent females. J Adolesc Health (1999) 1.73

Reported sexually transmitted disease clinic attendance and sexually transmitted infections in britain: prevalence, risk factors, and proportionate population burden. J Infect Dis (2005) 1.53

Avoiding risky sex partners: perception of partners' risks v partners' self reported risks. Sex Transm Infect (2003) 1.49

Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT). Popul Trends (2005) 1.28

Improving questions on sexual partnerships: lessons learned from cognitive interviews for Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles ("Natsal-3"). Arch Sex Behav (2012) 1.16

Efficacy of patient-delivered partner medication in the treatment of sexual partners in Uganda. Sex Transm Dis (2001) 1.13

Factors influencing sexual partner referral for sexually transmitted diseases in Uganda. Sex Transm Dis (1999) 1.01

Estimating the likely public health impact of partner notification for a clinical service: an evidence-based algorithm. Am J Public Health (2011) 0.91

2013 UK national guideline for consultations requiring sexual history taking. Clinical Effectiveness Group British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Int J STD AIDS (2013) 0.81

Chlamydial partner notification in the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) 2011 UK national audit against the BASHH Medical Foundation for AIDS and Sexual Health Sexually Transmitted Infections Management Standards. Int J STD AIDS (2012) 0.78

Audit on the success of partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in the West Midlands. Int J STD AIDS (2008) 0.78