mHealth or eHealth? Efficacy, Use, and Appreciation of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention for Dutch Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PubWeight™: 0.76‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 27829576)

Published in J Med Internet Res on November 09, 2016

Authors

Stefanie Gomez Quiñonez1,2, Michel Jean Louis Walthouwer3, Daniela Nadine Schulz, Hein de Vries1,2

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
2: CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
3: Maastricht University, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht, Netherlands. michel.walthouwer@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Articles cited by this

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods (2007) 50.83

Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol (2000) 27.26

Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet (2012) 20.56

Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ (2006) 19.45

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods (2009) 18.51

The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res (2005) 15.30

CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res (2011) 9.62

The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res (2004) 7.81

The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health (2009) 6.75

Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res (2009) 5.41

The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet (2012) 5.31

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr (2006) 5.17

Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform (2011) 4.90

A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med (2010) 4.89

A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med (2006) 4.77

Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 3.31

Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res (2013) 2.70

Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns (1999) 2.70

Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction. J Hosp Med (2012) 2.57

The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol. BMC Res Notes (2010) 2.57

Physical exercise and psychological well being: a critical review. Br J Sports Med (1998) 2.25

A development and evaluation process for mHealth interventions: examples from New Zealand. J Health Commun (2012) 2.20

Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs (2013) 2.18

Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychol (2000) 2.02

The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res (2003) 1.81

Smart-phone obesity prevention trial for adolescent boys in low-income communities: the ATLAS RCT. Pediatrics (2014) 1.80

An assessment of self-reported physical activity instruments in young people for population surveillance: Project ALPHA. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act (2011) 1.52

Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol (2011) 1.50

Randomized controlled pilot study testing use of smartphone technology for obesity treatment. J Obes (2013) 1.40

Surfing the internet for health information: an italian survey on use and population choices. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2011) 1.37

Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence. J Med Syst (2013) 1.37

Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Educ Res (2006) 1.35

Understanding usage of a hybrid website and smartphone app for weight management: a mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res (2014) 1.25

Distraction: an assessment of smartphone usage in health care work settings. Risk Manag Healthc Policy (2012) 1.23

Use of the internet as a health information resource among French young adults: results from a nationally representative survey. J Med Internet Res (2014) 1.23

Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform (2012) 1.22

Development and process evaluation of a web-based smoking cessation program for college smokers: innovative tool for education. Patient Educ Couns (2004) 1.18

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of Internet-based computer tailoring for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res (2013) 1.09

Current mHealth technologies for physical activity assessment and promotion. Am J Prev Med (2013) 1.02

Effectiveness of web-based tailored advice on parents' child safety behaviors: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res (2014) 0.94

Economic evaluation of a web-based tailored lifestyle intervention for adults: findings regarding cost-effectiveness and cost-utility from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res (2014) 0.89

Study protocol of a Dutch smoking cessation e-health program. BMC Public Health (2011) 0.87

MHealth: promise and pitfalls. Front Health Serv Manage (2012) 0.83

Daily physical activity in ankylosing spondylitis: validity and reliability of the IPAQ and SQUASH and the relation with clinical assessments. Arthritis Res Ther (2013) 0.81