Published in Syst Rev on November 28, 2016
Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol (1994) 13.59
The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv (1992) 8.04
Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health (2003) 7.72
A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health (2002) 4.42
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: the reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health (2004) 4.36
Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthc Policy (2006) 3.48
Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health (2009) 2.90
What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health (2012) 2.80
Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.59
Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.59
Annotated Bibliography on Equity in Health, 1980-2001. Int J Equity Health (2002) 2.31
PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med (2012) 2.31
A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health (2007) 2.19
A systematic review of the effectiveness of health service interventions aimed at reducing inequalities in health. J Health Serv Res Policy (1996) 2.08
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.03
Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.02
Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.98
Systematic review of the use of financial incentives in treatments for obesity and overweight. Obes Rev (2007) 1.74
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.73
Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.68
Road traffic crashes: operationalizing equity in the context of health sector reform. Inj Control Saf Promot (2003) 1.67
Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: placing an equity lens on existing systematic reviews. BMC Public Health (2008) 1.57
Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. BMJ (2010) 1.56
A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.44
Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ (2006) 1.36
Cochrane and Campbell Collaborations, and health equity. Lancet (2006) 1.20
Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.18
Housing and health inequalities: a synthesis of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at different pathways linking housing and health. Health Place (2010) 1.16
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.14
Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods. Syst Rev (2013) 1.05
Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2015) 0.99
A framework for production of systematic review based briefings to support evidence-informed decision-making. Syst Rev (2012) 0.98
Does consideration and assessment of effects on health equity affect the conclusions of systematic reviews? A methodology study. PLoS One (2012) 0.92
Eight-year follow-up of school-based intervention on childhood overweight--the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study. Obes Facts (2011) 0.91
Development and evaluation of 'briefing notes' as a novel knowledge translation tool to aid the implementation of sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a pilot study. PLoS One (2014) 0.90
Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors. PLoS One (2013) 0.87
The challenges of including sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a qualitative survey. Syst Rev (2014) 0.86
Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 0.82
An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 0.81
'It is surely a great criticism of our profession...' The next 20 years of equity-focused systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health (2013) 0.77