The need for a comprehensive framework.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 27936507)

Published in Addiction on January 01, 2017

Authors

David T Levy1, Geoffrey T Fong2, K Michael Cummings3, Ron Borland4, David B Abrams5,6,7, Andrea C Villanti5, Ray Niaura5

Author Affiliations

1: Georgetown University - Oncology, Washington, DC, USA.
2: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
3: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
4: Cancer Council Victoria-Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Victoria, Australia.
5: Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
6: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Ringgold standard institution-Health, Behavior and Society, Baltimore, MD, USA.
7: Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Ringgold standard institution-Oncology, Washington, DC, USA.

Articles cited by this

Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Am J Prev Med (2008) 3.69

The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model. Tob Control (2008) 2.07

The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction (2008) 2.03

The Brazil SimSmoke policy simulation model: the effect of strong tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in a middle income nation. PLoS Med (2012) 1.65

A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products. Addiction (2016) 1.23

Predicting the future prevalence of cigarette smoking in Australia: how low can we go and by when? Tob Control (2009) 1.15

Application of a system dynamics model to inform investment in smoking cessation services in New Zealand. Am J Public Health (2010) 1.02

Trends in E-Cigarette Awareness, Trial, and Use Under the Different Regulatory Environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res (2014) 1.00

SimSmokeFinn: how far can tobacco control policies move Finland toward tobacco-free 2040 goals? Scand J Public Health (2012) 0.99

Lessons learned from the application of systems science to tobacco control at the National Cancer Institute. Am J Public Health (2010) 0.96

Looking for the next breakthrough in tobacco control and health. S Afr Med J (2013) 0.90

Withholding differential risk information on legal consumer nicotine/tobacco products: The public health ethics of health information quarantines. Int J Drug Policy (2016) 0.81

Differential Taxes for Differential Risks--Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products. N Engl J Med (2015) 0.81

A gateway to more productive research on e-cigarettes? Commentary on a comprehensive framework for evaluating public health impact. Addiction (2016) 0.80

Does the regulatory environment for e-cigarettes influence the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation?: Longitudinal findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res (2017) 0.79

Is public health regulation the biggest factor influencing the use and uptake of vaporized nicotine products? Addiction (2016) 0.78

The potential impact of vaporized nicotine products on vulnerable subpopulations. Addiction (2016) 0.78